Company patentsCompare
HEAD TO HEAD
Technology portfolios compared in the same window and counting units. Scale is compared only within the same field or subclass.
This is a structural comparison of collected portfolios. The same requested window does not establish equal entity scope, covered months or industry; no competitive ranking is inferred.
Applicant-name coverage differs. The counts below cover only the listed names and do not represent complete company portfolios.
China Construction Bank: Applicant names included in these statistics — CHINA CONSTRUCTION BANK CORPReviewed names not covered — CHINA CONSTRUCTION BANK CORPORATION · 中国建设银行股份有限公司
Kweichow Moutai: Applicant names included in these statistics — KWEICHOW MOUTAI CO LTDReviewed names not covered — KWEICHOW MOUTAI CO., LTD. · 贵州茅台酒股份有限公司
SpaceX: Applicant names included in these statistics — SPACE EXPLORATION TECH CORPReviewed names not covered — SPACE EXPLORATION TECHNOLOGIES CORP. · SPACE EXPLORATION TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION
China Construction Bank
Kweichow Moutai
SpaceX
China Construction Bank × Kweichow Moutai
China Construction Bank × SpaceX
Kweichow Moutai × SpaceX
The 12 fields with the largest combined share. Share shows structure; count shows scale.
| Technology field | China Construction Bank / Kweichow Moutai / SpaceX |
|---|---|
| Computer technology | 72.3% 24.1% 0% |
| Telecommunications | 0.5% 0% 78.1% |
| Digital communication | 17.9% 0% 29.7% |
| IT methods for management | 40.7% 2.4% 0% |
| Measurement | 0% 30.1% 3.1% |
| Biotechnology | 0% 24.1% 1.6% |
| Food chemistry | 0% 18.1% 0% |
| Analysis of biological materials | 0% 13.3% 0% |
| Handling | 0% 9.6% 0% |
| Basic communication processes | 0% 0% 9.4% |
| Environmental technology | 0% 7.2% 0% |
| Mechanical elements | 0% 1.2% 4.7% |
Inspect collected applications, portfolio share and supporting publications within one field. A technology overlap does not establish that companies in different industries are direct competitors.
Coverage is incomplete; counts and shares describe only the collected subset.
This field was not observed in the collected records; this does not establish that the company has no patents in it.
View China Construction Bank publications in this fieldCoverage is incomplete; counts and shares describe only the collected subset.
This field was not observed in the collected records; this does not establish that the company has no patents in it.
View Kweichow Moutai publications in this fieldCoverage is incomplete; counts and shares describe only the collected subset.
View SpaceX publications in this fieldOne application may belong to multiple fields, so shares can sum to more than 100%. Drill-down lists publications; an application publication and its grant may appear separately.
The 10 subclasses in every company's top 60 with the most combined applications. Scale is compared within a subclass, never across different business scopes.
No subclass is shared by all companies in their top-60 lists. Absence from a list does not establish absence of related patents.
Observed emphasis within each company’s collected top-60 IPC subclasses. A dash for another company means outside its top-60 list, not zero applications or a market gap. Incomplete coverage can also change the ordering.
| Period | China Construction Bank | Kweichow Moutai | SpaceX |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-01 | ≥199 (partial coverage) | ≥6 (partial coverage) | ≥6 (partial coverage) |
| 2025-02 | ≥228 (partial coverage) | ≥6 (partial coverage) | ≥10 (partial coverage) |
| 2025-03 | ≥163 (partial coverage) | ≥7 (partial coverage) | ≥6 (partial coverage) |
| 2025-04 | ≥52 (partial coverage) | ≥2 (partial coverage) | ≥3 (partial coverage) |
| 2025-05 | ≥15 (partial coverage) | ≥7 (partial coverage) | ≥10 (partial coverage) |
| 2025-06 | ≥16 (partial coverage) | ≥5 (partial coverage) | ≥7 (partial coverage) |
| 2025-07 | ≥22 (partial coverage) | ≥5 (partial coverage) | ≥8 (partial coverage) |
| 2025-08 | ≥16 (partial coverage) | ≥4 (partial coverage) | ≥2 (partial coverage) |
| 2025-09 | ≥10 (partial coverage) | ≥11 (partial coverage) | ≥7 (partial coverage) |
| 2025-10 | ≥11 (partial coverage) | ≥10 (partial coverage) | ≥3 (partial coverage) |
| 2025-11 | ≥67 (partial coverage) | ≥10 (partial coverage) | ≥6 (partial coverage) |
| 2025-12 | ≥307 (partial coverage) | ≥10 (partial coverage) | ≥3 (partial coverage) |
Empty dashed outlines mark uncollected periods. Hatched bars and ≥ counts mark partial coverage.
Publication timing follows examination and publication cycles, not R&D intensity.
What makes it comparableThe same publication window and counting units. Companies with different windows are not put in one comparison.
What is not comparableGroup totals. Business and entity scopes differ; compare scale within a field or subclass.
Not a rankingSimilarity and shares describe structure, not patent value, quality or technical leadership.
