Alphabet (Google)
- Collected applications
- 143
- Share of collected applications with IPC
- 1.8%
Coverage is incomplete; counts and shares describe only the collected subset.
View Alphabet (Google) publications in this fieldCompany patentsCompare
HEAD TO HEAD
Alphabet (Google)MicrosoftNVIDIA
Technology portfolios compared in the same window and counting units. Scale is compared only within the same field or subclass.
+ Agricultural Bank of China2025-01 — 2025-12+ Alibaba2025-01 — 2025-12✓ Alphabet (Google)2025-01 — 2025-12+ Amazon2025-01 — 2025-12+ Apple2025-01 — 2025-12+ Bank of China2025-01 — 2025-12+ BOE2024-01 — 2024-12+ Broadcom2025-01 — 2025-12+ BYD2024-01 — 2024-12+ CATL2024-01 — 2024-12+ China Construction Bank2025-01 — 2025-12+ China Mobile2025-01 — 2025-12+ CXMT2025-01 — 2025-12+ Eli Lilly2025-01 — 2025-12+ Huawei2024-01 — 2024-12+ ICBC2025-01 — 2025-12+ Meta2025-01 — 2025-12✓ Microsoft2025-01 — 2025-12+ Midea2024-01 — 2024-12+ Kweichow Moutai2025-01 — 2025-12✓ NVIDIA2025-01 — 2025-12+ PetroChina2025-01 — 2025-12+ SpaceX2025-01 — 2025-12+ Tencent2025-01 — 2025-12+ Tesla2025-01 — 2025-12
Same window · published 2025-01-01 — 2025-12-31Some name or date coverage is incomplete; affected counts are lower bounds
This is a structural comparison of collected portfolios. The same requested window does not establish equal entity scope, covered months or industry; no competitive ranking is inferred.
Applicant-name coverage differs. The counts below cover only the listed names and do not represent complete company portfolios.
Alphabet (Google): Applicant names included in these statistics — GOOGLE INC · GOOGLE LLCReviewed names not covered — GOOGLE INC. · GOOGLE LLC (N.D.GES.D. STAATES DELAWARE) · GOOGLE LLC (N.D.GES.D.STAATES DELAWARE) · GOOGLE LLC.
Microsoft: Applicant names included in these statistics — MICROSOFT TECHNOLOGY LICENSING LLCReviewed names not covered — MICROSOFT TECHNOLOGY LICENSING, LLC · MICROSOFT TECHNOLOGY LICENSING, LLC.
NVIDIA: Applicant names included in these statistics — NVIDIA CORPReviewed names not covered — NVIDIA CORP. · NVIDIA CORPORATION
Alphabet (Google)
- Publications
- 8,710
- Invention share
- 92%
- Concentration
- 0.52
- Green technology
- —
Microsoft
- Publications
- 7,140
- Invention share
- 97%
- Concentration
- 0.59
- Green technology
- —
NVIDIA
- Publications
- 2,387
- Invention share
- 81%
- Concentration
- 0.66
- Green technology
- —
1.00
Alphabet (Google) × Microsoft
0.97
Alphabet (Google) × NVIDIA
0.97
Microsoft × NVIDIA
01Technology field mirror
The 12 fields with the largest combined share. Share shows structure; count shows scale.
| Technology field | Alphabet (Google) / Microsoft / NVIDIA |
|---|---|
| Computer technology | 66.8% 72.5% 79.3% |
| Digital communication | 22.7% 22.4% 9.1% |
| Audio-visual technology | 11% 10.5% 8.8% |
| Measurement | 4.4% 2.1% 7% |
| Telecommunications | 6.5% 3.3% 2.4% |
| IT methods for management | 3.6% 4.2% 0.5% |
| Optics | 3.7% 3.8% 0.8% |
| Control | 2.1% 1% 5% |
| Transport | 0.6% 0.1% 6.9% |
| Semiconductors | 2.2% 2.1% 1.1% |
| Electrical machinery, apparatus, energy | 1.8% 2.1% 1.1% |
| Basic communication processes | 1.1% 1.3% 1.8% |
Inspect one technology field
Inspect collected applications, portfolio share and supporting publications within one field. A technology overlap does not establish that companies in different industries are direct competitors.
Microsoft
- Collected applications
- 147
- Share of collected applications with IPC
- 2.1%
Coverage is incomplete; counts and shares describe only the collected subset.
View Microsoft publications in this fieldNVIDIA
- Collected applications
- 25
- Share of collected applications with IPC
- 1.1%
Coverage is incomplete; counts and shares describe only the collected subset.
View NVIDIA publications in this fieldOne application may belong to multiple fields, so shares can sum to more than 100%. Drill-down lists publications; an application publication and its grant may appear separately.
02Same problem: shared IPC subclasses
The 10 subclasses in every company's top 60 with the most combined applications. Scale is compared within a subclass, never across different business scopes.
G06FData processing
Alphabet (Google)3,435
Microsoft3,890
NVIDIA881
G06NComputing models, AI
Alphabet (Google)1,594
Microsoft1,064
NVIDIA497
H04LDigital transmission
Alphabet (Google)1,020
Microsoft1,379
NVIDIA155
G06TImage processing
Alphabet (Google)708
Microsoft479
NVIDIA719
G10LSpeech processing
Alphabet (Google)1,012
Microsoft250
NVIDIA87
H04NPictorial communication, video
Alphabet (Google)704
Microsoft482
NVIDIA127
G06VImage and video recognition
Alphabet (Google)525
Microsoft295
NVIDIA403
H04WWireless networks
Alphabet (Google)885
Microsoft196
NVIDIA42
G06QBusiness data processing
Alphabet (Google)290
Microsoft290
NVIDIA12
G02BOptical elements
Alphabet (Google)275
Microsoft236
NVIDIA13
03Where each one leans
Observed emphasis within each company’s collected top-60 IPC subclasses. A dash for another company means outside its top-60 list, not zero applications or a market gap. Incomplete coverage can also change the ordering.
Alphabet (Google)
- G10LSpeech processing
- Alphabet (Google)
- 1,012
- Microsoft
- 250
- NVIDIA
- 87
- H04WWireless networks
- Alphabet (Google)
- 885
- Microsoft
- 196
- NVIDIA
- 42
- H04BTransmission
- Alphabet (Google)
- 281
- Microsoft
- 108
- NVIDIA
- 43
- H04NPictorial communication, video
- Alphabet (Google)
- 704
- Microsoft
- 482
- NVIDIA
- 127
- H04RLoudspeakers, microphones
- Alphabet (Google)
- 126
- Microsoft
- 35
- NVIDIA
- 5
- A61BMedical diagnosis
- Alphabet (Google)
- 106
- Microsoft
- 20
- NVIDIA
- 5
Microsoft
- G06FData processing
- Alphabet (Google)
- 3,435
- Microsoft
- 3,890
- NVIDIA
- 881
- H04LDigital transmission
- Alphabet (Google)
- 1,020
- Microsoft
- 1,379
- NVIDIA
- 155
- G06QBusiness data processing
- Alphabet (Google)
- 290
- Microsoft
- 290
- NVIDIA
- 12
- C12QBiochemical testing
- Alphabet (Google)
- —
- Microsoft
- 24
- NVIDIA
- —
- H10N
- Alphabet (Google)
- 27
- Microsoft
- 45
- NVIDIA
- —
- H01RElectrical connectors
- Alphabet (Google)
- 12
- Microsoft
- 29
- NVIDIA
- —
NVIDIA
- G06TImage processing
- Alphabet (Google)
- 708
- Microsoft
- 479
- NVIDIA
- 719
- G06VImage and video recognition
- Alphabet (Google)
- 525
- Microsoft
- 295
- NVIDIA
- 403
- B60WVehicle sub-unit control
- Alphabet (Google)
- 17
- Microsoft
- —
- NVIDIA
- 138
- G05D
- Alphabet (Google)
- 27
- Microsoft
- —
- NVIDIA
- 64
- G06NComputing models, AI
- Alphabet (Google)
- 1,594
- Microsoft
- 1,064
- NVIDIA
- 497
- B25JManipulators, robots
- Alphabet (Google)
- 66
- Microsoft
- —
- NVIDIA
- 60
04Publication rhythm
| Period | Alphabet (Google) | Microsoft | NVIDIA |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-01 | ≥747 (partial coverage) | ≥539 (partial coverage) | ≥182 (partial coverage) |
| 2025-02 | ≥760 (partial coverage) | ≥503 (partial coverage) | ≥166 (partial coverage) |
| 2025-03 | ≥828 (partial coverage) | ≥603 (partial coverage) | ≥170 (partial coverage) |
| 2025-04 | ≥810 (partial coverage) | ≥647 (partial coverage) | ≥158 (partial coverage) |
| 2025-05 | ≥765 (partial coverage) | ≥566 (partial coverage) | ≥193 (partial coverage) |
| 2025-06 | ≥744 (partial coverage) | ≥487 (partial coverage) | ≥183 (partial coverage) |
| 2025-07 | ≥895 (partial coverage) | ≥686 (partial coverage) | ≥243 (partial coverage) |
| 2025-08 | ≥629 (partial coverage) | ≥563 (partial coverage) | ≥182 (partial coverage) |
| 2025-09 | ≥586 (partial coverage) | ≥587 (partial coverage) | ≥265 (partial coverage) |
| 2025-10 | ≥684 (partial coverage) | ≥689 (partial coverage) | ≥234 (partial coverage) |
| 2025-11 | ≥623 (partial coverage) | ≥582 (partial coverage) | ≥199 (partial coverage) |
| 2025-12 | ≥639 (partial coverage) | ≥688 (partial coverage) | ≥212 (partial coverage) |
Empty dashed outlines mark uncollected periods. Hatched bars and ≥ counts mark partial coverage.
Publication timing follows examination and publication cycles, not R&D intensity.
What makes it comparableThe same publication window and counting units. Companies with different windows are not put in one comparison.
What is not comparableGroup totals. Business and entity scopes differ; compare scale within a field or subclass.
Not a rankingSimilarity and shares describe structure, not patent value, quality or technical leadership.