CNIPA.AI

Company patentsCompare

HEAD TO HEAD

Alphabet (Google)AmazonEli Lilly

Technology portfolios compared in the same window and counting units. Scale is compared only within the same field or subclass.

Same window · published 2025-01-01 — 2025-12-31Some name or date coverage is incomplete; affected counts are lower bounds

This is a structural comparison of collected portfolios. The same requested window does not establish equal entity scope, covered months or industry; no competitive ranking is inferred.

Applicant-name coverage differs. The counts below cover only the listed names and do not represent complete company portfolios.

Alphabet (Google): Applicant names included in these statistics — GOOGLE INC · GOOGLE LLCReviewed names not covered — GOOGLE INC. · GOOGLE LLC (N.D.GES.D. STAATES DELAWARE) · GOOGLE LLC (N.D.GES.D.STAATES DELAWARE) · GOOGLE LLC.

Amazon: Applicant names included in these statistics — AMAZON TECH INCReviewed names not covered — AMAZON TECHNOLOGIES INC · AMAZON TECHNOLOGIES INC. · AMAZON TECHNOLOGIES, INC · AMAZON TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

Eli Lilly: Applicant names included in these statistics — ELI LILLY AND CO · ELI LILLY AND COMPANY USA · LILLY CO ELIReviewed names not covered — ELI LILLY AND COMPANY

Alphabet (Google)

Publications
8,710
Invention share
92%
Concentration
0.52
Green technology
—

Amazon

Publications
2,095
Invention share
93%
Concentration
0.54
Green technology
—

Eli Lilly

Publications
1,602
Invention share
45%
Concentration
0.73
Green technology
—
0.99

Alphabet (Google) × Amazon

0.01

Alphabet (Google) × Eli Lilly

0.02

Amazon × Eli Lilly

Cosine similarity of application counts across 35 fields. 1 is identical, 0 is no overlap.

01Technology field mirror

The 12 fields with the largest combined share. Share shows structure; count shows scale.

Technology field mirror
Technology fieldAlphabet (Google) / Amazon / Eli Lilly
Computer technology
66.8%
65.9%
0.6%
Pharmaceuticals
0%
0.2%
68.5%
Digital communication
22.7%
29.5%
0.1%
Biotechnology
0%
0.6%
39.9%
Organic fine chemistry
0%
0%
25.8%
Medical technology
1.7%
0.7%
17.6%
Audio-visual technology
11%
7%
0.1%
IT methods for management
3.6%
7.9%
0.2%
Telecommunications
6.5%
4%
0%
Measurement
4.4%
3.8%
1%
Control
2.1%
5.2%
0.6%
Handling
1%
4.9%
0.2%

Inspect one technology field

Inspect collected applications, portfolio share and supporting publications within one field. A technology overlap does not establish that companies in different industries are direct competitors.

One application may belong to multiple fields, so shares can sum to more than 100%. Drill-down lists publications; an application publication and its grant may appear separately.

02Same problem: shared IPC subclasses

The 10 subclasses in every company's top 60 with the most combined applications. Scale is compared within a subclass, never across different business scopes.

G06FData processing
Alphabet (Google)3,435
Amazon912
Eli Lilly2
G06NComputing models, AI
Alphabet (Google)1,594
Amazon257
Eli Lilly3
H04WWireless networks
Alphabet (Google)885
Amazon114
Eli Lilly2
G06TImage processing
Alphabet (Google)708
Amazon101
Eli Lilly5
G06VImage and video recognition
Alphabet (Google)525
Amazon138
Eli Lilly2
G06QBusiness data processing
Alphabet (Google)290
Amazon154
Eli Lilly3
A61BMedical diagnosis
Alphabet (Google)106
Amazon7
Eli Lilly36
G16H
Alphabet (Google)48
Amazon6
Eli Lilly36
G08B
Alphabet (Google)45
Amazon20
Eli Lilly5
G05BControl systems
Alphabet (Google)35
Amazon19
Eli Lilly4

03Where each one leans

Observed emphasis within each company’s collected top-60 IPC subclasses. A dash for another company means outside its top-60 list, not zero applications or a market gap. Incomplete coverage can also change the ordering.

Alphabet (Google)

  • G06NComputing models, AI
    Alphabet (Google)
    1,594
    Amazon
    257
    Eli Lilly
    3
  • H04WWireless networks
    Alphabet (Google)
    885
    Amazon
    114
    Eli Lilly
    2
  • G06TImage processing
    Alphabet (Google)
    708
    Amazon
    101
    Eli Lilly
    5
  • G02BOptical elements
    Alphabet (Google)
    275
    Amazon
    11
    Eli Lilly
    —
  • H04NPictorial communication, video
    Alphabet (Google)
    704
    Amazon
    130
    Eli Lilly
    —
  • H04BTransmission
    Alphabet (Google)
    281
    Amazon
    40
    Eli Lilly
    —

Amazon

  • H04LDigital transmission
    Alphabet (Google)
    1,020
    Amazon
    442
    Eli Lilly
    —
  • G06QBusiness data processing
    Alphabet (Google)
    290
    Amazon
    154
    Eli Lilly
    3
  • G06FData processing
    Alphabet (Google)
    3,435
    Amazon
    912
    Eli Lilly
    2
  • B65GConveying, storage
    Alphabet (Google)
    —
    Amazon
    48
    Eli Lilly
    —
  • G05D
    Alphabet (Google)
    27
    Amazon
    36
    Eli Lilly
    —
  • G10LSpeech processing
    Alphabet (Google)
    1,012
    Amazon
    275
    Eli Lilly
    —

Eli Lilly

  • A61K
    Alphabet (Google)
    —
    Amazon
    4
    Eli Lilly
    926
  • A61P
    Alphabet (Google)
    —
    Amazon
    —
    Eli Lilly
    766
  • C07K
    Alphabet (Google)
    —
    Amazon
    —
    Eli Lilly
    454
  • C07DHeterocyclic compounds
    Alphabet (Google)
    —
    Amazon
    —
    Eli Lilly
    300
  • A61M
    Alphabet (Google)
    —
    Amazon
    —
    Eli Lilly
    196
  • C12NMicroorganisms, enzymes
    Alphabet (Google)
    —
    Amazon
    —
    Eli Lilly
    153

04Publication rhythm

Alphabet (Google)AmazonEli LillyPublications per period
Publications per period
PeriodAlphabet (Google)AmazonEli Lilly
2025-01≥747 (partial coverage)≥242 (partial coverage)≥118 (partial coverage)
2025-02≥760 (partial coverage)≥149 (partial coverage)≥121 (partial coverage)
2025-03≥828 (partial coverage)≥130 (partial coverage)≥158 (partial coverage)
2025-04≥810 (partial coverage)≥168 (partial coverage)≥110 (partial coverage)
2025-05≥765 (partial coverage)≥186 (partial coverage)≥134 (partial coverage)
2025-06≥744 (partial coverage)≥140 (partial coverage)≥140 (partial coverage)
2025-07≥895 (partial coverage)≥223 (partial coverage)≥138 (partial coverage)
2025-08≥629 (partial coverage)≥161 (partial coverage)≥134 (partial coverage)
2025-09≥586 (partial coverage)≥195 (partial coverage)≥132 (partial coverage)
2025-10≥684 (partial coverage)≥201 (partial coverage)≥155 (partial coverage)
2025-11≥623 (partial coverage)≥141 (partial coverage)≥140 (partial coverage)
2025-12≥639 (partial coverage)≥159 (partial coverage)≥122 (partial coverage)

Empty dashed outlines mark uncollected periods. Hatched bars and ≥ counts mark partial coverage.

Publication timing follows examination and publication cycles, not R&D intensity.

What makes it comparableThe same publication window and counting units. Companies with different windows are not put in one comparison.

What is not comparableGroup totals. Business and entity scopes differ; compare scale within a field or subclass.

Not a rankingSimilarity and shares describe structure, not patent value, quality or technical leadership.