Alphabet (Google)
- Collected applications
- 143
- Share of collected applications with IPC
- 1.8%
Coverage is incomplete; counts and shares describe only the collected subset.
View Alphabet (Google) publications in this fieldCompany patentsCompare
HEAD TO HEAD
Alphabet (Google)AmazonMicrosoft
Technology portfolios compared in the same window and counting units. Scale is compared only within the same field or subclass.
+ Agricultural Bank of China2025-01 — 2025-12+ Alibaba2025-01 — 2025-12✓ Alphabet (Google)2025-01 — 2025-12✓ Amazon2025-01 — 2025-12+ Apple2025-01 — 2025-12+ Bank of China2025-01 — 2025-12+ BOE2024-01 — 2024-12+ Broadcom2025-01 — 2025-12+ BYD2024-01 — 2024-12+ CATL2024-01 — 2024-12+ China Construction Bank2025-01 — 2025-12+ China Mobile2025-01 — 2025-12+ CXMT2025-01 — 2025-12+ Eli Lilly2025-01 — 2025-12+ Huawei2024-01 — 2024-12+ ICBC2025-01 — 2025-12+ Meta2025-01 — 2025-12✓ Microsoft2025-01 — 2025-12+ Midea2024-01 — 2024-12+ Kweichow Moutai2025-01 — 2025-12+ NVIDIA2025-01 — 2025-12+ PetroChina2025-01 — 2025-12+ SpaceX2025-01 — 2025-12+ Tencent2025-01 — 2025-12+ Tesla2025-01 — 2025-12
Same window · published 2025-01-01 — 2025-12-31Some name or date coverage is incomplete; affected counts are lower bounds
This is a structural comparison of collected portfolios. The same requested window does not establish equal entity scope, covered months or industry; no competitive ranking is inferred.
Applicant-name coverage differs. The counts below cover only the listed names and do not represent complete company portfolios.
Alphabet (Google): Applicant names included in these statistics — GOOGLE INC · GOOGLE LLCReviewed names not covered — GOOGLE INC. · GOOGLE LLC (N.D.GES.D. STAATES DELAWARE) · GOOGLE LLC (N.D.GES.D.STAATES DELAWARE) · GOOGLE LLC.
Amazon: Applicant names included in these statistics — AMAZON TECH INCReviewed names not covered — AMAZON TECHNOLOGIES INC · AMAZON TECHNOLOGIES INC. · AMAZON TECHNOLOGIES, INC · AMAZON TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Microsoft: Applicant names included in these statistics — MICROSOFT TECHNOLOGY LICENSING LLCReviewed names not covered — MICROSOFT TECHNOLOGY LICENSING, LLC · MICROSOFT TECHNOLOGY LICENSING, LLC.
Alphabet (Google)
- Publications
- 8,710
- Invention share
- 92%
- Concentration
- 0.52
- Green technology
- —
Amazon
- Publications
- 2,095
- Invention share
- 93%
- Concentration
- 0.54
- Green technology
- —
Microsoft
- Publications
- 7,140
- Invention share
- 97%
- Concentration
- 0.59
- Green technology
- —
0.99
Alphabet (Google) × Amazon
1.00
Alphabet (Google) × Microsoft
0.98
Amazon × Microsoft
01Technology field mirror
The 12 fields with the largest combined share. Share shows structure; count shows scale.
| Technology field | Alphabet (Google) / Amazon / Microsoft |
|---|---|
| Computer technology | 66.8% 65.9% 72.5% |
| Digital communication | 22.7% 29.5% 22.4% |
| Audio-visual technology | 11% 7% 10.5% |
| IT methods for management | 3.6% 7.9% 4.2% |
| Telecommunications | 6.5% 4% 3.3% |
| Measurement | 4.4% 3.8% 2.1% |
| Optics | 3.7% 0.9% 3.8% |
| Control | 2.1% 5.2% 1% |
| Handling | 1% 4.9% 0.1% |
| Electrical machinery, apparatus, energy | 1.8% 2% 2.1% |
| Semiconductors | 2.2% 0.3% 2.1% |
| Transport | 0.6% 3.5% 0.1% |
Inspect one technology field
Inspect collected applications, portfolio share and supporting publications within one field. A technology overlap does not establish that companies in different industries are direct competitors.
Amazon
- Collected applications
- 39
- Share of collected applications with IPC
- 2%
Coverage is incomplete; counts and shares describe only the collected subset.
View Amazon publications in this fieldMicrosoft
- Collected applications
- 147
- Share of collected applications with IPC
- 2.1%
Coverage is incomplete; counts and shares describe only the collected subset.
View Microsoft publications in this fieldOne application may belong to multiple fields, so shares can sum to more than 100%. Drill-down lists publications; an application publication and its grant may appear separately.
02Same problem: shared IPC subclasses
The 10 subclasses in every company's top 60 with the most combined applications. Scale is compared within a subclass, never across different business scopes.
G06FData processing
Alphabet (Google)3,435
Amazon912
Microsoft3,890
G06NComputing models, AI
Alphabet (Google)1,594
Amazon257
Microsoft1,064
H04LDigital transmission
Alphabet (Google)1,020
Amazon442
Microsoft1,379
G10LSpeech processing
Alphabet (Google)1,012
Amazon275
Microsoft250
H04NPictorial communication, video
Alphabet (Google)704
Amazon130
Microsoft482
G06TImage processing
Alphabet (Google)708
Amazon101
Microsoft479
H04WWireless networks
Alphabet (Google)885
Amazon114
Microsoft196
G06VImage and video recognition
Alphabet (Google)525
Amazon138
Microsoft295
G06QBusiness data processing
Alphabet (Google)290
Amazon154
Microsoft290
G02BOptical elements
Alphabet (Google)275
Amazon11
Microsoft236
03Where each one leans
Observed emphasis within each company’s collected top-60 IPC subclasses. A dash for another company means outside its top-60 list, not zero applications or a market gap. Incomplete coverage can also change the ordering.
Alphabet (Google)
- H04WWireless networks
- Alphabet (Google)
- 885
- Amazon
- 114
- Microsoft
- 196
- G06NComputing models, AI
- Alphabet (Google)
- 1,594
- Amazon
- 257
- Microsoft
- 1,064
- G06TImage processing
- Alphabet (Google)
- 708
- Amazon
- 101
- Microsoft
- 479
- H04NPictorial communication, video
- Alphabet (Google)
- 704
- Amazon
- 130
- Microsoft
- 482
- H04BTransmission
- Alphabet (Google)
- 281
- Amazon
- 40
- Microsoft
- 108
- A61BMedical diagnosis
- Alphabet (Google)
- 106
- Amazon
- 7
- Microsoft
- 20
Amazon
- G06QBusiness data processing
- Alphabet (Google)
- 290
- Amazon
- 154
- Microsoft
- 290
- B65GConveying, storage
- Alphabet (Google)
- —
- Amazon
- 48
- Microsoft
- —
- H04LDigital transmission
- Alphabet (Google)
- 1,020
- Amazon
- 442
- Microsoft
- 1,379
- G05D
- Alphabet (Google)
- 27
- Amazon
- 36
- Microsoft
- —
- G10LSpeech processing
- Alphabet (Google)
- 1,012
- Amazon
- 275
- Microsoft
- 250
- B64UUnmanned aerial vehicles
- Alphabet (Google)
- —
- Amazon
- 25
- Microsoft
- —
Microsoft
- G06FData processing
- Alphabet (Google)
- 3,435
- Amazon
- 912
- Microsoft
- 3,890
- H05KPrinted circuits, assemblies
- Alphabet (Google)
- 104
- Amazon
- 20
- Microsoft
- 164
- G16B
- Alphabet (Google)
- —
- Amazon
- —
- Microsoft
- 26
- H10N
- Alphabet (Google)
- 27
- Amazon
- —
- Microsoft
- 45
- H03MCoding, decoding
- Alphabet (Google)
- 33
- Amazon
- 7
- Microsoft
- 47
- A63F
- Alphabet (Google)
- 38
- Amazon
- 15
- Microsoft
- 69
04Publication rhythm
| Period | Alphabet (Google) | Amazon | Microsoft |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-01 | ≥747 (partial coverage) | ≥242 (partial coverage) | ≥539 (partial coverage) |
| 2025-02 | ≥760 (partial coverage) | ≥149 (partial coverage) | ≥503 (partial coverage) |
| 2025-03 | ≥828 (partial coverage) | ≥130 (partial coverage) | ≥603 (partial coverage) |
| 2025-04 | ≥810 (partial coverage) | ≥168 (partial coverage) | ≥647 (partial coverage) |
| 2025-05 | ≥765 (partial coverage) | ≥186 (partial coverage) | ≥566 (partial coverage) |
| 2025-06 | ≥744 (partial coverage) | ≥140 (partial coverage) | ≥487 (partial coverage) |
| 2025-07 | ≥895 (partial coverage) | ≥223 (partial coverage) | ≥686 (partial coverage) |
| 2025-08 | ≥629 (partial coverage) | ≥161 (partial coverage) | ≥563 (partial coverage) |
| 2025-09 | ≥586 (partial coverage) | ≥195 (partial coverage) | ≥587 (partial coverage) |
| 2025-10 | ≥684 (partial coverage) | ≥201 (partial coverage) | ≥689 (partial coverage) |
| 2025-11 | ≥623 (partial coverage) | ≥141 (partial coverage) | ≥582 (partial coverage) |
| 2025-12 | ≥639 (partial coverage) | ≥159 (partial coverage) | ≥688 (partial coverage) |
Empty dashed outlines mark uncollected periods. Hatched bars and ≥ counts mark partial coverage.
Publication timing follows examination and publication cycles, not R&D intensity.
What makes it comparableThe same publication window and counting units. Companies with different windows are not put in one comparison.
What is not comparableGroup totals. Business and entity scopes differ; compare scale within a field or subclass.
Not a rankingSimilarity and shares describe structure, not patent value, quality or technical leadership.