CNIPA.AI

Company patentsCompare

HEAD TO HEAD

AmazonBank of ChinaSpaceX

Technology portfolios compared in the same window and counting units. Scale is compared only within the same field or subclass.

Same window · published 2025-01-01 — 2025-12-31Some name or date coverage is incomplete; affected counts are lower bounds

This is a structural comparison of collected portfolios. The same requested window does not establish equal entity scope, covered months or industry; no competitive ranking is inferred.

Applicant-name coverage differs. The counts below cover only the listed names and do not represent complete company portfolios.

Amazon: Applicant names included in these statistics — AMAZON TECH INCReviewed names not covered — AMAZON TECHNOLOGIES INC · AMAZON TECHNOLOGIES INC. · AMAZON TECHNOLOGIES, INC · AMAZON TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

Bank of China: Applicant names included in these statistics — BANK OF CHINA CO LTD · BANK OF CHINA LTDReviewed names not covered — BANK OF CHINA LIMITED · 中国银行股份有限公司

SpaceX: Applicant names included in these statistics — SPACE EXPLORATION TECH CORPReviewed names not covered — SPACE EXPLORATION TECHNOLOGIES CORP. · SPACE EXPLORATION TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION

Amazon

Publications
2,095
Invention share
93%
Concentration
0.54
Green technology
—

Bank of China

Publications
138
Invention share
98%
Concentration
0.75
Green technology
—

SpaceX

Publications
71
Invention share
80%
Concentration
0.71
Green technology
—
0.89

Amazon × Bank of China

0.20

Amazon × SpaceX

0.06

Bank of China × SpaceX

Cosine similarity of application counts across 35 fields. 1 is identical, 0 is no overlap.

01Technology field mirror

The 12 fields with the largest combined share. Share shows structure; count shows scale.

Technology field mirror
Technology fieldAmazon / Bank of China / SpaceX
Computer technology
65.9%
74.6%
0%
Telecommunications
4%
0%
78.1%
Digital communication
29.5%
13.8%
29.7%
IT methods for management
7.9%
42%
0%
Audio-visual technology
7%
3.6%
1.6%
Basic communication processes
0.8%
0%
9.4%
Measurement
3.8%
0%
3.1%
Electrical machinery, apparatus, energy
2%
0%
4.7%
Mechanical elements
0.2%
0.7%
4.7%
Control
5.2%
0%
0%
Transport
3.5%
0%
1.6%
Handling
4.9%
0%
0%

Inspect one technology field

Inspect collected applications, portfolio share and supporting publications within one field. A technology overlap does not establish that companies in different industries are direct competitors.

One application may belong to multiple fields, so shares can sum to more than 100%. Drill-down lists publications; an application publication and its grant may appear separately.

02Same problem: shared IPC subclasses

The 10 subclasses in every company's top 60 with the most combined applications. Scale is compared within a subclass, never across different business scopes.

H04LDigital transmission
Amazon442
Bank of China19
SpaceX13
H04WWireless networks
Amazon114
Bank of China1
SpaceX15
H05KPrinted circuits, assemblies
Amazon20
Bank of China2
SpaceX1

03Where each one leans

Observed emphasis within each company’s collected top-60 IPC subclasses. A dash for another company means outside its top-60 list, not zero applications or a market gap. Incomplete coverage can also change the ordering.

Amazon

  • G10LSpeech processing
    Amazon
    275
    Bank of China
    1
    SpaceX
    —
  • H04NPictorial communication, video
    Amazon
    130
    Bank of China
    3
    SpaceX
    —
  • H04LDigital transmission
    Amazon
    442
    Bank of China
    19
    SpaceX
    13
  • B65GConveying, storage
    Amazon
    48
    Bank of China
    —
    SpaceX
    —
  • B25JManipulators, robots
    Amazon
    39
    Bank of China
    —
    SpaceX
    —
  • G05D
    Amazon
    36
    Bank of China
    —
    SpaceX
    —

Bank of China

  • G06QBusiness data processing
    Amazon
    154
    Bank of China
    58
    SpaceX
    —
  • G06FData processing
    Amazon
    912
    Bank of China
    83
    SpaceX
    —
  • G06VImage and video recognition
    Amazon
    138
    Bank of China
    18
    SpaceX
    —
  • F17D
    Amazon
    —
    Bank of China
    1
    SpaceX
    —
  • G06NComputing models, AI
    Amazon
    257
    Bank of China
    18
    SpaceX
    —
  • G06TImage processing
    Amazon
    101
    Bank of China
    7
    SpaceX
    —

SpaceX

  • H01QAntennas
    Amazon
    11
    Bank of China
    —
    SpaceX
    30
  • H04BTransmission
    Amazon
    40
    Bank of China
    —
    SpaceX
    29
  • H04WWireless networks
    Amazon
    114
    Bank of China
    1
    SpaceX
    15
  • H03L
    Amazon
    —
    Bank of China
    —
    SpaceX
    4
  • C08K
    Amazon
    —
    Bank of China
    —
    SpaceX
    2
  • F16BFasteners
    Amazon
    —
    Bank of China
    —
    SpaceX
    2

04Publication rhythm

AmazonBank of ChinaSpaceXPublications per period
Publications per period
PeriodAmazonBank of ChinaSpaceX
2025-01≥242 (partial coverage)≥19 (partial coverage)≥6 (partial coverage)
2025-02≥149 (partial coverage)≥65 (partial coverage)≥10 (partial coverage)
2025-03≥130 (partial coverage)≥51 (partial coverage)≥6 (partial coverage)
2025-04≥168 (partial coverage)Not collected≥3 (partial coverage)
2025-05≥186 (partial coverage)Not collected≥10 (partial coverage)
2025-06≥140 (partial coverage)Not collected≥7 (partial coverage)
2025-07≥223 (partial coverage)Not collected≥8 (partial coverage)
2025-08≥161 (partial coverage)Not collected≥2 (partial coverage)
2025-09≥195 (partial coverage)≥1 (partial coverage)≥7 (partial coverage)
2025-10≥201 (partial coverage)Not collected≥3 (partial coverage)
2025-11≥141 (partial coverage)Not collected≥6 (partial coverage)
2025-12≥159 (partial coverage)≥2 (partial coverage)≥3 (partial coverage)

Empty dashed outlines mark uncollected periods. Hatched bars and ≥ counts mark partial coverage.

Publication timing follows examination and publication cycles, not R&D intensity.

What makes it comparableThe same publication window and counting units. Companies with different windows are not put in one comparison.

What is not comparableGroup totals. Business and entity scopes differ; compare scale within a field or subclass.

Not a rankingSimilarity and shares describe structure, not patent value, quality or technical leadership.