CNIPA.AI

Company patentsCompare

HEAD TO HEAD

AmazonBroadcomSpaceX

Technology portfolios compared in the same window and counting units. Scale is compared only within the same field or subclass.

Same window · published 2025-01-01 — 2025-12-31Some name or date coverage is incomplete; affected counts are lower bounds

This is a structural comparison of collected portfolios. The same requested window does not establish equal entity scope, covered months or industry; no competitive ranking is inferred.

Applicant-name coverage differs. The counts below cover only the listed names and do not represent complete company portfolios.

Amazon: Applicant names included in these statistics — AMAZON TECH INCReviewed names not covered — AMAZON TECHNOLOGIES INC · AMAZON TECHNOLOGIES INC. · AMAZON TECHNOLOGIES, INC · AMAZON TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

Broadcom: Applicant names included in these statistics — AVAGO TECH INT SALES PTE LID · AVAGO TECH INTERNATIONAL SALES PTE LTD · VMWARE INC · VMWARE LLCReviewed names not covered — AVAGO TECHNOLOGIES INTERNATIONAL SALES PTE. LIMITED · VMWARE INC.

SpaceX: Applicant names included in these statistics — SPACE EXPLORATION TECH CORPReviewed names not covered — SPACE EXPLORATION TECHNOLOGIES CORP. · SPACE EXPLORATION TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION

Amazon

Publications
2,095
Invention share
93%
Concentration
0.54
Green technology
—

Broadcom

Publications
1,230
Invention share
98%
Concentration
0.41
Green technology
—

SpaceX

Publications
71
Invention share
80%
Concentration
0.71
Green technology
—
0.89

Amazon × Broadcom

0.20

Amazon × SpaceX

0.36

Broadcom × SpaceX

Cosine similarity of application counts across 35 fields. 1 is identical, 0 is no overlap.

01Technology field mirror

The 12 fields with the largest combined share. Share shows structure; count shows scale.

Technology field mirror
Technology fieldAmazon / Broadcom / SpaceX
Computer technology
65.9%
42.4%
0%
Digital communication
29.5%
45.2%
29.7%
Telecommunications
4%
5.8%
78.1%
Basic communication processes
0.8%
10.9%
9.4%
Audio-visual technology
7%
3.1%
1.6%
Measurement
3.8%
2.5%
3.1%
Electrical machinery, apparatus, energy
2%
1.8%
4.7%
IT methods for management
7.9%
0.4%
0%
Semiconductors
0.3%
7.4%
0%
Control
5.2%
0.5%
0%
Transport
3.5%
0.2%
1.6%
Handling
4.9%
0%
0%

Inspect one technology field

Inspect collected applications, portfolio share and supporting publications within one field. A technology overlap does not establish that companies in different industries are direct competitors.

One application may belong to multiple fields, so shares can sum to more than 100%. Drill-down lists publications; an application publication and its grant may appear separately.

02Same problem: shared IPC subclasses

The 10 subclasses in every company's top 60 with the most combined applications. Scale is compared within a subclass, never across different business scopes.

H04LDigital transmission
Amazon442
Broadcom439
SpaceX13
H04WWireless networks
Amazon114
Broadcom126
SpaceX15
H04BTransmission
Amazon40
Broadcom58
SpaceX29
H03MCoding, decoding
Amazon7
Broadcom62
SpaceX1
H01QAntennas
Amazon11
Broadcom1
SpaceX30
G01SRadar, positioning
Amazon24
Broadcom7
SpaceX2
H05KPrinted circuits, assemblies
Amazon20
Broadcom10
SpaceX1
H02JPower supply, energy storage
Amazon15
Broadcom5
SpaceX2

03Where each one leans

Observed emphasis within each company’s collected top-60 IPC subclasses. A dash for another company means outside its top-60 list, not zero applications or a market gap. Incomplete coverage can also change the ordering.

Amazon

  • G10LSpeech processing
    Amazon
    275
    Broadcom
    2
    SpaceX
    —
  • G06NComputing models, AI
    Amazon
    257
    Broadcom
    28
    SpaceX
    —
  • G06QBusiness data processing
    Amazon
    154
    Broadcom
    5
    SpaceX
    —
  • G06VImage and video recognition
    Amazon
    138
    Broadcom
    4
    SpaceX
    —
  • H04NPictorial communication, video
    Amazon
    130
    Broadcom
    20
    SpaceX
    —
  • G06FData processing
    Amazon
    912
    Broadcom
    456
    SpaceX
    —

Broadcom

  • H04LDigital transmission
    Amazon
    442
    Broadcom
    439
    SpaceX
    13
  • H01LSemiconductor devices
    Amazon
    —
    Broadcom
    60
    SpaceX
    —
  • H03MCoding, decoding
    Amazon
    7
    Broadcom
    62
    SpaceX
    1
  • H10W
    Amazon
    —
    Broadcom
    36
    SpaceX
    —
  • H03HImpedance networks, filters
    Amazon
    4
    Broadcom
    22
    SpaceX
    —
  • H03K
    Amazon
    —
    Broadcom
    19
    SpaceX
    —

SpaceX

  • H01QAntennas
    Amazon
    11
    Broadcom
    1
    SpaceX
    30
  • H04BTransmission
    Amazon
    40
    Broadcom
    58
    SpaceX
    29
  • H04WWireless networks
    Amazon
    114
    Broadcom
    126
    SpaceX
    15
  • H03L
    Amazon
    —
    Broadcom
    6
    SpaceX
    4
  • C08K
    Amazon
    —
    Broadcom
    —
    SpaceX
    2
  • F16BFasteners
    Amazon
    —
    Broadcom
    —
    SpaceX
    2

04Publication rhythm

AmazonBroadcomSpaceXPublications per period
Publications per period
PeriodAmazonBroadcomSpaceX
2025-01≥242 (partial coverage)≥207 (partial coverage)≥6 (partial coverage)
2025-02≥149 (partial coverage)≥92 (partial coverage)≥10 (partial coverage)
2025-03≥130 (partial coverage)≥141 (partial coverage)≥6 (partial coverage)
2025-04≥168 (partial coverage)≥163 (partial coverage)≥3 (partial coverage)
2025-05≥186 (partial coverage)≥101 (partial coverage)≥10 (partial coverage)
2025-06≥140 (partial coverage)≥79 (partial coverage)≥7 (partial coverage)
2025-07≥223 (partial coverage)≥77 (partial coverage)≥8 (partial coverage)
2025-08≥161 (partial coverage)≥56 (partial coverage)≥2 (partial coverage)
2025-09≥195 (partial coverage)≥69 (partial coverage)≥7 (partial coverage)
2025-10≥201 (partial coverage)≥86 (partial coverage)≥3 (partial coverage)
2025-11≥141 (partial coverage)≥94 (partial coverage)≥6 (partial coverage)
2025-12≥159 (partial coverage)≥65 (partial coverage)≥3 (partial coverage)

Empty dashed outlines mark uncollected periods. Hatched bars and ≥ counts mark partial coverage.

Publication timing follows examination and publication cycles, not R&D intensity.

What makes it comparableThe same publication window and counting units. Companies with different windows are not put in one comparison.

What is not comparableGroup totals. Business and entity scopes differ; compare scale within a field or subclass.

Not a rankingSimilarity and shares describe structure, not patent value, quality or technical leadership.