BOE
- Collected applications
- 81
- Share of collected applications with IPC
- 2.2%
Coverage is incomplete; counts and shares describe only the collected subset.
View BOE publications in this fieldCompany patentsCompare
HEAD TO HEAD
Technology portfolios compared in the same window and counting units. Scale is compared only within the same field or subclass.
This is a structural comparison of collected portfolios. The same requested window does not establish equal entity scope, covered months or industry; no competitive ranking is inferred.
Applicant-name coverage differs. The counts below cover only the listed names and do not represent complete company portfolios.
BOE: Applicant names included in these statistics — BOE TECHNOLOGY GROUP CO LTDReviewed names not covered — 京东方科技集团股份有限公司
Huawei: Applicant names included in these statistics — HUAWEI TECH CO LTDReviewed names not covered — HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO LTD · 华为技术有限公司
The 12 fields with the largest combined share. Share shows structure; count shows scale.
| BOE | Technology field | Huawei |
|---|---|---|
36.4% | Audio-visual technology | 10.5% |
39.8% | Semiconductors | 4.7% |
15.6% | Computer technology | 27.8% |
2.6% | Digital communication | 39.6% |
19.3% | Optics | 5.1% |
3.2% | Telecommunications | 14.3% |
2.3% | Measurement | 4.5% |
2.2% | Electrical machinery, apparatus, energy | 3.6% |
0.4% | Transport | 3.4% |
0.7% | Basic communication processes | 1.9% |
0.8% | Control | 1.6% |
1% | Medical technology | 1.1% |
Inspect collected applications, portfolio share and supporting publications within one field. A technology overlap does not establish that companies in different industries are direct competitors.
Coverage is incomplete; counts and shares describe only the collected subset.
View BOE publications in this fieldCoverage is incomplete; counts and shares describe only the collected subset.
View Huawei publications in this fieldOne application may belong to multiple fields, so shares can sum to more than 100%. Drill-down lists publications; an application publication and its grant may appear separately.
The 10 subclasses in every company's top 60 with the most combined applications. Scale is compared within a subclass, never across different business scopes.
Observed emphasis within each company’s collected top-60 IPC subclasses. A dash for another company means outside its top-60 list, not zero applications or a market gap. Incomplete coverage can also change the ordering.
| Period | BOE | Huawei |
|---|---|---|
| 2024-01 | ≥468 (partial coverage) | ≥864 (partial coverage) |
| 2024-02 | ≥365 (partial coverage) | ≥634 (partial coverage) |
| 2024-03 | ≥562 (partial coverage) | ≥1,387 (partial coverage) |
| 2024-04 | ≥600 (partial coverage) | ≥955 (partial coverage) |
| 2024-05 | ≥495 (partial coverage) | ≥1,099 (partial coverage) |
| 2024-06 | ≥382 (partial coverage) | ≥828 (partial coverage) |
| 2024-07 | ≥451 (partial coverage) | ≥900 (partial coverage) |
| 2024-08 | ≥417 (partial coverage) | ≥981 (partial coverage) |
| 2024-09 | Not collected | ≥751 (partial coverage) |
| 2024-10 | Not collected | Not collected |
| 2024-11 | Not collected | Not collected |
| 2024-12 | Not collected | Not collected |
Empty dashed outlines mark uncollected periods. Hatched bars and ≥ counts mark partial coverage.
Publication timing follows examination and publication cycles, not R&D intensity.
What makes it comparableThe same publication window and counting units. Companies with different windows are not put in one comparison.
What is not comparableGroup totals. Business and entity scopes differ; compare scale within a field or subclass.
Not a rankingSimilarity and shares describe structure, not patent value, quality or technical leadership.