Alibaba
- Collected applications
- 3
- Share of collected applications with IPC
- 0.3%
Coverage is incomplete; counts and shares describe only the collected subset.
View Alibaba publications in this fieldCompany patentsCompare
HEAD TO HEAD
Technology portfolios compared in the same window and counting units. Scale is compared only within the same field or subclass.
This is a structural comparison of collected portfolios. The same requested window does not establish equal entity scope, covered months or industry; no competitive ranking is inferred.
Applicant-name coverage differs. The counts below cover only the listed names and do not represent complete company portfolios.
Alibaba: Applicant names included in these statistics — ALIBABA CHINA CO LTD · ALIBABA CLOUD COMPUTING CO LTD · ALIBABA CLOUD COMPUTING LTD · ALIBABA GROUP HOLDING LTDReviewed names not covered — ALIBABA (CHINA) CO., LTD. · ALIBABA CLOUD COMPUTING CO., LTD. · ALIBABA CLOUD COMPUTING LTD. · ALIBABA GROUP HOLDING LIMITED · 阿里云计算有限公司 · 阿里巴巴集团控股有限公司 · 阿里巴巴(中国)有限公司
Broadcom: Applicant names included in these statistics — AVAGO TECH INT SALES PTE LID · AVAGO TECH INTERNATIONAL SALES PTE LTD · VMWARE INC · VMWARE LLCReviewed names not covered — AVAGO TECHNOLOGIES INTERNATIONAL SALES PTE. LIMITED · VMWARE INC.
Microsoft: Applicant names included in these statistics — MICROSOFT TECHNOLOGY LICENSING LLCReviewed names not covered — MICROSOFT TECHNOLOGY LICENSING, LLC · MICROSOFT TECHNOLOGY LICENSING, LLC.
Alibaba
Broadcom
Microsoft
Alibaba × Broadcom
Alibaba × Microsoft
Broadcom × Microsoft
The 12 fields with the largest combined share. Share shows structure; count shows scale.
| Technology field | Alibaba / Broadcom / Microsoft |
|---|---|
| Computer technology | 63.5% 42.4% 72.5% |
| Digital communication | 12.5% 45.2% 22.4% |
| Audio-visual technology | 29.8% 3.1% 10.5% |
| Basic communication processes | 0.6% 10.9% 1.3% |
| Semiconductors | 0.6% 7.4% 2.1% |
| Telecommunications | 0% 5.8% 3.3% |
| IT methods for management | 3.7% 0.4% 4.2% |
| Measurement | 0.8% 2.5% 2.1% |
| Optics | 0% 1.4% 3.8% |
| Electrical machinery, apparatus, energy | 0.3% 1.8% 2.1% |
| Control | 0.2% 0.5% 1% |
| Medical technology | 0.4% 0.2% 0.7% |
Inspect collected applications, portfolio share and supporting publications within one field. A technology overlap does not establish that companies in different industries are direct competitors.
Coverage is incomplete; counts and shares describe only the collected subset.
View Alibaba publications in this fieldCoverage is incomplete; counts and shares describe only the collected subset.
View Broadcom publications in this fieldCoverage is incomplete; counts and shares describe only the collected subset.
View Microsoft publications in this fieldOne application may belong to multiple fields, so shares can sum to more than 100%. Drill-down lists publications; an application publication and its grant may appear separately.
The 10 subclasses in every company's top 60 with the most combined applications. Scale is compared within a subclass, never across different business scopes.
Observed emphasis within each company’s collected top-60 IPC subclasses. A dash for another company means outside its top-60 list, not zero applications or a market gap. Incomplete coverage can also change the ordering.
| Period | Alibaba | Broadcom | Microsoft |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-01 | ≥78 (partial coverage) | ≥207 (partial coverage) | ≥539 (partial coverage) |
| 2025-02 | ≥71 (partial coverage) | ≥92 (partial coverage) | ≥503 (partial coverage) |
| 2025-03 | ≥72 (partial coverage) | ≥141 (partial coverage) | ≥603 (partial coverage) |
| 2025-04 | ≥65 (partial coverage) | ≥163 (partial coverage) | ≥647 (partial coverage) |
| 2025-05 | ≥71 (partial coverage) | ≥101 (partial coverage) | ≥566 (partial coverage) |
| 2025-06 | ≥83 (partial coverage) | ≥79 (partial coverage) | ≥487 (partial coverage) |
| 2025-07 | ≥82 (partial coverage) | ≥77 (partial coverage) | ≥686 (partial coverage) |
| 2025-08 | ≥104 (partial coverage) | ≥56 (partial coverage) | ≥563 (partial coverage) |
| 2025-09 | ≥119 (partial coverage) | ≥69 (partial coverage) | ≥587 (partial coverage) |
| 2025-10 | ≥94 (partial coverage) | ≥86 (partial coverage) | ≥689 (partial coverage) |
| 2025-11 | ≥115 (partial coverage) | ≥94 (partial coverage) | ≥582 (partial coverage) |
| 2025-12 | ≥147 (partial coverage) | ≥65 (partial coverage) | ≥688 (partial coverage) |
Empty dashed outlines mark uncollected periods. Hatched bars and ≥ counts mark partial coverage.
Publication timing follows examination and publication cycles, not R&D intensity.
What makes it comparableThe same publication window and counting units. Companies with different windows are not put in one comparison.
What is not comparableGroup totals. Business and entity scopes differ; compare scale within a field or subclass.
Not a rankingSimilarity and shares describe structure, not patent value, quality or technical leadership.