Broadcom
- Collected applications
- 35
- Share of collected applications with IPC
- 3.1%
Coverage is incomplete; counts and shares describe only the collected subset.
View Broadcom publications in this fieldCompany patentsCompare
HEAD TO HEAD
BroadcomEli LillySpaceX
Technology portfolios compared in the same window and counting units. Scale is compared only within the same field or subclass.
+ Agricultural Bank of China2025-01 — 2025-12+ Alibaba2025-01 — 2025-12+ Alphabet (Google)2025-01 — 2025-12+ Amazon2025-01 — 2025-12+ Apple2025-01 — 2025-12+ Bank of China2025-01 — 2025-12+ BOE2024-01 — 2024-12✓ Broadcom2025-01 — 2025-12+ BYD2024-01 — 2024-12+ CATL2024-01 — 2024-12+ China Construction Bank2025-01 — 2025-12+ China Mobile2025-01 — 2025-12+ CXMT2025-01 — 2025-12✓ Eli Lilly2025-01 — 2025-12+ Huawei2024-01 — 2024-12+ ICBC2025-01 — 2025-12+ Meta2025-01 — 2025-12+ Microsoft2025-01 — 2025-12+ Midea2024-01 — 2024-12+ Kweichow Moutai2025-01 — 2025-12+ NVIDIA2025-01 — 2025-12+ PetroChina2025-01 — 2025-12✓ SpaceX2025-01 — 2025-12+ Tencent2025-01 — 2025-12+ Tesla2025-01 — 2025-12
Same window · published 2025-01-01 — 2025-12-31Some name or date coverage is incomplete; affected counts are lower bounds
This is a structural comparison of collected portfolios. The same requested window does not establish equal entity scope, covered months or industry; no competitive ranking is inferred.
Applicant-name coverage differs. The counts below cover only the listed names and do not represent complete company portfolios.
Broadcom: Applicant names included in these statistics — AVAGO TECH INT SALES PTE LID · AVAGO TECH INTERNATIONAL SALES PTE LTD · VMWARE INC · VMWARE LLCReviewed names not covered — AVAGO TECHNOLOGIES INTERNATIONAL SALES PTE. LIMITED · VMWARE INC.
Eli Lilly: Applicant names included in these statistics — ELI LILLY AND CO · ELI LILLY AND COMPANY USA · LILLY CO ELIReviewed names not covered — ELI LILLY AND COMPANY
SpaceX: Applicant names included in these statistics — SPACE EXPLORATION TECH CORPReviewed names not covered — SPACE EXPLORATION TECHNOLOGIES CORP. · SPACE EXPLORATION TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION
Broadcom
- Publications
- 1,230
- Invention share
- 98%
- Concentration
- 0.41
- Green technology
- —
Eli Lilly
- Publications
- 1,602
- Invention share
- 45%
- Concentration
- 0.73
- Green technology
- —
SpaceX
- Publications
- 71
- Invention share
- 80%
- Concentration
- 0.71
- Green technology
- —
0.01
Broadcom × Eli Lilly
0.36
Broadcom × SpaceX
0.01
Eli Lilly × SpaceX
01Technology field mirror
The 12 fields with the largest combined share. Share shows structure; count shows scale.
| Technology field | Broadcom / Eli Lilly / SpaceX |
|---|---|
| Telecommunications | 5.8% 0% 78.1% |
| Digital communication | 45.2% 0.1% 29.7% |
| Pharmaceuticals | 0% 68.5% 0% |
| Computer technology | 42.4% 0.6% 0% |
| Biotechnology | 0% 39.9% 1.6% |
| Organic fine chemistry | 0% 25.8% 0% |
| Basic communication processes | 10.9% 0% 9.4% |
| Medical technology | 0.2% 17.6% 0% |
| Semiconductors | 7.4% 0% 0% |
| Measurement | 2.5% 1% 3.1% |
| Electrical machinery, apparatus, energy | 1.8% 0% 4.7% |
| Audio-visual technology | 3.1% 0.1% 1.6% |
Inspect one technology field
Inspect collected applications, portfolio share and supporting publications within one field. A technology overlap does not establish that companies in different industries are direct competitors.
Eli Lilly
- Collected applications
- 1
- Share of collected applications with IPC
- 0.1%
Coverage is incomplete; counts and shares describe only the collected subset.
View Eli Lilly publications in this fieldSpaceX
- Collected applications
- 1
- Share of collected applications with IPC
- 1.6%
Coverage is incomplete; counts and shares describe only the collected subset.
View SpaceX publications in this fieldOne application may belong to multiple fields, so shares can sum to more than 100%. Drill-down lists publications; an application publication and its grant may appear separately.
02Same problem: shared IPC subclasses
The 10 subclasses in every company's top 60 with the most combined applications. Scale is compared within a subclass, never across different business scopes.
H04WWireless networks
Broadcom126
Eli Lilly2
SpaceX15
03Where each one leans
Observed emphasis within each company’s collected top-60 IPC subclasses. A dash for another company means outside its top-60 list, not zero applications or a market gap. Incomplete coverage can also change the ordering.
Broadcom
- G06FData processing
- Broadcom
- 456
- Eli Lilly
- 2
- SpaceX
- —
- H04LDigital transmission
- Broadcom
- 439
- Eli Lilly
- —
- SpaceX
- 13
- H01LSemiconductor devices
- Broadcom
- 60
- Eli Lilly
- —
- SpaceX
- —
- H03MCoding, decoding
- Broadcom
- 62
- Eli Lilly
- —
- SpaceX
- 1
- H10W
- Broadcom
- 36
- Eli Lilly
- —
- SpaceX
- —
- G06NComputing models, AI
- Broadcom
- 28
- Eli Lilly
- 3
- SpaceX
- —
Eli Lilly
- A61K
- Broadcom
- —
- Eli Lilly
- 926
- SpaceX
- —
- A61P
- Broadcom
- —
- Eli Lilly
- 766
- SpaceX
- —
- C07K
- Broadcom
- —
- Eli Lilly
- 454
- SpaceX
- 1
- C07DHeterocyclic compounds
- Broadcom
- —
- Eli Lilly
- 300
- SpaceX
- —
- A61M
- Broadcom
- —
- Eli Lilly
- 196
- SpaceX
- —
- C12NMicroorganisms, enzymes
- Broadcom
- —
- Eli Lilly
- 153
- SpaceX
- —
SpaceX
- H01QAntennas
- Broadcom
- 1
- Eli Lilly
- —
- SpaceX
- 30
- H04BTransmission
- Broadcom
- 58
- Eli Lilly
- —
- SpaceX
- 29
- H04WWireless networks
- Broadcom
- 126
- Eli Lilly
- 2
- SpaceX
- 15
- H03L
- Broadcom
- 6
- Eli Lilly
- —
- SpaceX
- 4
- F16BFasteners
- Broadcom
- —
- Eli Lilly
- —
- SpaceX
- 2
- F16M
- Broadcom
- —
- Eli Lilly
- —
- SpaceX
- 2
04Publication rhythm
| Period | Broadcom | Eli Lilly | SpaceX |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-01 | ≥207 (partial coverage) | ≥118 (partial coverage) | ≥6 (partial coverage) |
| 2025-02 | ≥92 (partial coverage) | ≥121 (partial coverage) | ≥10 (partial coverage) |
| 2025-03 | ≥141 (partial coverage) | ≥158 (partial coverage) | ≥6 (partial coverage) |
| 2025-04 | ≥163 (partial coverage) | ≥110 (partial coverage) | ≥3 (partial coverage) |
| 2025-05 | ≥101 (partial coverage) | ≥134 (partial coverage) | ≥10 (partial coverage) |
| 2025-06 | ≥79 (partial coverage) | ≥140 (partial coverage) | ≥7 (partial coverage) |
| 2025-07 | ≥77 (partial coverage) | ≥138 (partial coverage) | ≥8 (partial coverage) |
| 2025-08 | ≥56 (partial coverage) | ≥134 (partial coverage) | ≥2 (partial coverage) |
| 2025-09 | ≥69 (partial coverage) | ≥132 (partial coverage) | ≥7 (partial coverage) |
| 2025-10 | ≥86 (partial coverage) | ≥155 (partial coverage) | ≥3 (partial coverage) |
| 2025-11 | ≥94 (partial coverage) | ≥140 (partial coverage) | ≥6 (partial coverage) |
| 2025-12 | ≥65 (partial coverage) | ≥122 (partial coverage) | ≥3 (partial coverage) |
Empty dashed outlines mark uncollected periods. Hatched bars and ≥ counts mark partial coverage.
Publication timing follows examination and publication cycles, not R&D intensity.
What makes it comparableThe same publication window and counting units. Companies with different windows are not put in one comparison.
What is not comparableGroup totals. Business and entity scopes differ; compare scale within a field or subclass.
Not a rankingSimilarity and shares describe structure, not patent value, quality or technical leadership.