BYD
- Collected applications
- 1,743
- Share of collected applications with IPC
- 31.8%
Coverage is incomplete; counts and shares describe only the collected subset.
View BYD publications in this fieldCompany patentsCompare
HEAD TO HEAD
Technology portfolios compared in the same window and counting units. Scale is compared only within the same field or subclass.
This is a structural comparison of collected portfolios. The same requested window does not establish equal entity scope, covered months or industry; no competitive ranking is inferred.
Applicant-name coverage differs. The counts below cover only the listed names and do not represent complete company portfolios.
BYD: Applicant names included in these statistics — BYD CO LTDReviewed names not covered — 比亚迪股份有限公司
CATL: Applicant names included in these statistics — NINGDE CONTEMPORARY AMPEREX TECH CO LTDReviewed names not covered — CONTEMPORARY AMPEREX TECHNOLOGY CO LTD · 宁德时代新能源科技股份有限公司
Midea: Applicant names included in these statistics — MIDEA GROUP CO LTDReviewed names not covered — 美的集团股份有限公司
BYD
CATL
Midea
BYD × CATL
BYD × Midea
CATL × Midea
The 12 fields with the largest combined share. Share shows structure; count shows scale.
| Technology field | BYD / CATL / Midea |
|---|---|
| Electrical machinery, apparatus, energy | 31.8% 76.6% 8.6% |
| Transport | 45.4% 5.8% 0.5% |
| Thermal processes and apparatus | 1.1% 0.6% 42.1% |
| Other consumer goods | 1.1% 0.1% 18.8% |
| Measurement | 5.2% 10.4% 2.5% |
| Computer technology | 6.9% 3.6% 6.8% |
| Mechanical elements | 8.3% 1.9% 6.8% |
| Furniture, games | 0.2% 0% 13.6% |
| Environmental technology | 1.1% 0.9% 8.4% |
| Handling | 1.7% 4.9% 3.6% |
| Audio-visual technology | 3.8% 1.2% 4% |
| Chemical engineering | 0.6% 3% 4.7% |
Inspect collected applications, portfolio share and supporting publications within one field. A technology overlap does not establish that companies in different industries are direct competitors.
Coverage is incomplete; counts and shares describe only the collected subset.
View BYD publications in this fieldCoverage is incomplete; counts and shares describe only the collected subset.
View CATL publications in this fieldCoverage is incomplete; counts and shares describe only the collected subset.
View Midea publications in this fieldOne application may belong to multiple fields, so shares can sum to more than 100%. Drill-down lists publications; an application publication and its grant may appear separately.
The 10 subclasses in every company's top 60 with the most combined applications. Scale is compared within a subclass, never across different business scopes.
Observed emphasis within each company’s collected top-60 IPC subclasses. A dash for another company means outside its top-60 list, not zero applications or a market gap. Incomplete coverage can also change the ordering.
| Period | BYD | CATL | Midea |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-01 | ≥448 (partial coverage) | ≥289 (partial coverage) | ≥207 (partial coverage) |
| 2024-02 | ≥217 (partial coverage) | ≥262 (partial coverage) | ≥102 (partial coverage) |
| 2024-03 | ≥288 (partial coverage) | ≥365 (partial coverage) | ≥265 (partial coverage) |
| 2024-04 | ≥360 (partial coverage) | ≥356 (partial coverage) | ≥211 (partial coverage) |
| 2024-05 | ≥524 (partial coverage) | ≥460 (partial coverage) | ≥226 (partial coverage) |
| 2024-06 | ≥999 (partial coverage) | ≥331 (partial coverage) | ≥212 (partial coverage) |
| 2024-07 | ≥1,283 (partial coverage) | ≥532 (partial coverage) | ≥265 (partial coverage) |
| 2024-08 | ≥855 (partial coverage) | ≥665 (partial coverage) | ≥138 (partial coverage) |
| 2024-09 | ≥512 (partial coverage) | ≥468 (partial coverage) | ≥144 (partial coverage) |
| 2024-10 | Not collected | Not collected | Not collected |
| 2024-11 | Not collected | Not collected | Not collected |
| 2024-12 | Not collected | Not collected | Not collected |
Empty dashed outlines mark uncollected periods. Hatched bars and ≥ counts mark partial coverage.
Publication timing follows examination and publication cycles, not R&D intensity.
What makes it comparableThe same publication window and counting units. Companies with different windows are not put in one comparison.
What is not comparableGroup totals. Business and entity scopes differ; compare scale within a field or subclass.
Not a rankingSimilarity and shares describe structure, not patent value, quality or technical leadership.