CNIPA.AI

Company patentsCompare

HEAD TO HEAD

Alphabet (Google)China Construction BankEli Lilly

Technology portfolios compared in the same window and counting units. Scale is compared only within the same field or subclass.

Same window · published 2025-01-01 — 2025-12-31Some name or date coverage is incomplete; affected counts are lower bounds

This is a structural comparison of collected portfolios. The same requested window does not establish equal entity scope, covered months or industry; no competitive ranking is inferred.

Applicant-name coverage differs. The counts below cover only the listed names and do not represent complete company portfolios.

Alphabet (Google): Applicant names included in these statistics — GOOGLE INC · GOOGLE LLCReviewed names not covered — GOOGLE INC. · GOOGLE LLC (N.D.GES.D. STAATES DELAWARE) · GOOGLE LLC (N.D.GES.D.STAATES DELAWARE) · GOOGLE LLC.

China Construction Bank: Applicant names included in these statistics — CHINA CONSTRUCTION BANK CORPReviewed names not covered — CHINA CONSTRUCTION BANK CORPORATION · 中国建设银行股份有限公司

Eli Lilly: Applicant names included in these statistics — ELI LILLY AND CO · ELI LILLY AND COMPANY USA · LILLY CO ELIReviewed names not covered — ELI LILLY AND COMPANY

Alphabet (Google)

Publications
8,710
Invention share
92%
Concentration
0.52
Green technology
—

China Construction Bank

Publications
1,106
Invention share
100%
Concentration
0.72
Green technology
—

Eli Lilly

Publications
1,602
Invention share
45%
Concentration
0.73
Green technology
—
0.88

Alphabet (Google) × China Construction Bank

0.01

Alphabet (Google) × Eli Lilly

0.01

China Construction Bank × Eli Lilly

Cosine similarity of application counts across 35 fields. 1 is identical, 0 is no overlap.

01Technology field mirror

The 12 fields with the largest combined share. Share shows structure; count shows scale.

Technology field mirror
Technology fieldAlphabet (Google) / China Construction Bank / Eli Lilly
Computer technology
66.8%
72.3%
0.6%
Pharmaceuticals
0%
0%
68.5%
IT methods for management
3.6%
40.7%
0.2%
Digital communication
22.7%
17.9%
0.1%
Biotechnology
0%
0%
39.9%
Organic fine chemistry
0%
0%
25.8%
Medical technology
1.7%
0.4%
17.6%
Audio-visual technology
11%
0.2%
0.1%
Telecommunications
6.5%
0.5%
0%
Measurement
4.4%
0%
1%
Optics
3.7%
0%
0%
Control
2.1%
0.5%
0.6%

Inspect one technology field

Inspect collected applications, portfolio share and supporting publications within one field. A technology overlap does not establish that companies in different industries are direct competitors.

One application may belong to multiple fields, so shares can sum to more than 100%. Drill-down lists publications; an application publication and its grant may appear separately.

02Same problem: shared IPC subclasses

The 10 subclasses in every company's top 60 with the most combined applications. Scale is compared within a subclass, never across different business scopes.

G06FData processing
Alphabet (Google)3,435
China Construction Bank764
Eli Lilly2
G06NComputing models, AI
Alphabet (Google)1,594
China Construction Bank118
Eli Lilly3
H04WWireless networks
Alphabet (Google)885
China Construction Bank5
Eli Lilly2
G06QBusiness data processing
Alphabet (Google)290
China Construction Bank450
Eli Lilly3
G06TImage processing
Alphabet (Google)708
China Construction Bank13
Eli Lilly5
G06VImage and video recognition
Alphabet (Google)525
China Construction Bank24
Eli Lilly2
G16H
Alphabet (Google)48
China Construction Bank4
Eli Lilly36
G08B
Alphabet (Google)45
China Construction Bank1
Eli Lilly5
G05BControl systems
Alphabet (Google)35
China Construction Bank1
Eli Lilly4

03Where each one leans

Observed emphasis within each company’s collected top-60 IPC subclasses. A dash for another company means outside its top-60 list, not zero applications or a market gap. Incomplete coverage can also change the ordering.

Alphabet (Google)

  • G10LSpeech processing
    Alphabet (Google)
    1,012
    China Construction Bank
    4
    Eli Lilly
    —
  • H04WWireless networks
    Alphabet (Google)
    885
    China Construction Bank
    5
    Eli Lilly
    2
  • G06NComputing models, AI
    Alphabet (Google)
    1,594
    China Construction Bank
    118
    Eli Lilly
    3
  • H04NPictorial communication, video
    Alphabet (Google)
    704
    China Construction Bank
    8
    Eli Lilly
    —
  • G06TImage processing
    Alphabet (Google)
    708
    China Construction Bank
    13
    Eli Lilly
    5
  • G06VImage and video recognition
    Alphabet (Google)
    525
    China Construction Bank
    24
    Eli Lilly
    2

China Construction Bank

  • G06QBusiness data processing
    Alphabet (Google)
    290
    China Construction Bank
    450
    Eli Lilly
    3
  • G06FData processing
    Alphabet (Google)
    3,435
    China Construction Bank
    764
    Eli Lilly
    2
  • H04LDigital transmission
    Alphabet (Google)
    1,020
    China Construction Bank
    191
    Eli Lilly
    —
  • G07F
    Alphabet (Google)
    —
    China Construction Bank
    1
    Eli Lilly
    —
  • G07G
    Alphabet (Google)
    —
    China Construction Bank
    1
    Eli Lilly
    —
  • G06K
    Alphabet (Google)
    13
    China Construction Bank
    2
    Eli Lilly
    —

Eli Lilly

  • A61K
    Alphabet (Google)
    —
    China Construction Bank
    —
    Eli Lilly
    926
  • A61P
    Alphabet (Google)
    —
    China Construction Bank
    —
    Eli Lilly
    766
  • C07K
    Alphabet (Google)
    —
    China Construction Bank
    —
    Eli Lilly
    454
  • C07DHeterocyclic compounds
    Alphabet (Google)
    —
    China Construction Bank
    —
    Eli Lilly
    300
  • A61M
    Alphabet (Google)
    —
    China Construction Bank
    —
    Eli Lilly
    196
  • C12NMicroorganisms, enzymes
    Alphabet (Google)
    —
    China Construction Bank
    —
    Eli Lilly
    153

04Publication rhythm

Alphabet (Google)China Construction BankEli LillyPublications per period
Publications per period
PeriodAlphabet (Google)China Construction BankEli Lilly
2025-01≥747 (partial coverage)≥199 (partial coverage)≥118 (partial coverage)
2025-02≥760 (partial coverage)≥228 (partial coverage)≥121 (partial coverage)
2025-03≥828 (partial coverage)≥163 (partial coverage)≥158 (partial coverage)
2025-04≥810 (partial coverage)≥52 (partial coverage)≥110 (partial coverage)
2025-05≥765 (partial coverage)≥15 (partial coverage)≥134 (partial coverage)
2025-06≥744 (partial coverage)≥16 (partial coverage)≥140 (partial coverage)
2025-07≥895 (partial coverage)≥22 (partial coverage)≥138 (partial coverage)
2025-08≥629 (partial coverage)≥16 (partial coverage)≥134 (partial coverage)
2025-09≥586 (partial coverage)≥10 (partial coverage)≥132 (partial coverage)
2025-10≥684 (partial coverage)≥11 (partial coverage)≥155 (partial coverage)
2025-11≥623 (partial coverage)≥67 (partial coverage)≥140 (partial coverage)
2025-12≥639 (partial coverage)≥307 (partial coverage)≥122 (partial coverage)

Empty dashed outlines mark uncollected periods. Hatched bars and ≥ counts mark partial coverage.

Publication timing follows examination and publication cycles, not R&D intensity.

What makes it comparableThe same publication window and counting units. Companies with different windows are not put in one comparison.

What is not comparableGroup totals. Business and entity scopes differ; compare scale within a field or subclass.

Not a rankingSimilarity and shares describe structure, not patent value, quality or technical leadership.