CNIPA.AI

Company patentsCompare

HEAD TO HEAD

China Construction BankNVIDIATencent

Technology portfolios compared in the same window and counting units. Scale is compared only within the same field or subclass.

Same window · published 2025-01-01 — 2025-12-31Some name or date coverage is incomplete; affected counts are lower bounds

This is a structural comparison of collected portfolios. The same requested window does not establish equal entity scope, covered months or industry; no competitive ranking is inferred.

Applicant-name coverage differs. The counts below cover only the listed names and do not represent complete company portfolios.

China Construction Bank: Applicant names included in these statistics — CHINA CONSTRUCTION BANK CORPReviewed names not covered — CHINA CONSTRUCTION BANK CORPORATION · 中国建设银行股份有限公司

NVIDIA: Applicant names included in these statistics — NVIDIA CORPReviewed names not covered — NVIDIA CORP. · NVIDIA CORPORATION

Tencent: Applicant names included in these statistics — TENCENT AMERICA LLC · TENCENT TECH SHENZHEN CO LTDReviewed names not covered — TENCENT TECHNOLOGY (SHENZHEN) CO., LTD. · TENCENT TECHNOLOGY (SHENZHEN) COMPANY LIMITED · 腾讯科技(深圳)有限公司 · 腾讯美国有限责任公司

China Construction Bank

Publications
1,106
Invention share
100%
Concentration
0.72
Green technology
—

NVIDIA

Publications
2,387
Invention share
81%
Concentration
0.66
Green technology
—

Tencent

Publications
9,476
Invention share
99%
Concentration
0.40
Green technology
—
0.86

China Construction Bank × NVIDIA

0.85

China Construction Bank × Tencent

0.91

NVIDIA × Tencent

Cosine similarity of application counts across 35 fields. 1 is identical, 0 is no overlap.

01Technology field mirror

The 12 fields with the largest combined share. Share shows structure; count shows scale.

Technology field mirror
Technology fieldChina Construction Bank / NVIDIA / Tencent
Computer technology
72.3%
79.3%
53.4%
IT methods for management
40.7%
0.5%
8.7%
Digital communication
17.9%
9.1%
19.4%
Audio-visual technology
0.2%
8.8%
23.4%
Furniture, games
0%
1.8%
12.3%
Measurement
0%
7%
1.3%
Transport
0%
6.9%
0.8%
Control
0.5%
5%
1.3%
Telecommunications
0.5%
2.4%
1%
Handling
0%
2.6%
0.9%
Basic communication processes
0%
1.8%
0.3%
Semiconductors
0%
1.1%
0.3%

Inspect one technology field

Inspect collected applications, portfolio share and supporting publications within one field. A technology overlap does not establish that companies in different industries are direct competitors.

NVIDIA

Collected applications
206
Share of collected applications with IPC
8.8%

Coverage is incomplete; counts and shares describe only the collected subset.

View NVIDIA publications in this field

Tencent

Collected applications
2,137
Share of collected applications with IPC
23.4%

Coverage is incomplete; counts and shares describe only the collected subset.

View Tencent publications in this field

One application may belong to multiple fields, so shares can sum to more than 100%. Drill-down lists publications; an application publication and its grant may appear separately.

02Same problem: shared IPC subclasses

The 10 subclasses in every company's top 60 with the most combined applications. Scale is compared within a subclass, never across different business scopes.

G06FData processing
China Construction Bank764
NVIDIA881
Tencent3,074
H04NPictorial communication, video
China Construction Bank8
NVIDIA127
Tencent2,479
G06TImage processing
China Construction Bank13
NVIDIA719
Tencent1,220
G06NComputing models, AI
China Construction Bank118
NVIDIA497
Tencent1,015
H04LDigital transmission
China Construction Bank191
NVIDIA155
Tencent1,218
G06QBusiness data processing
China Construction Bank450
NVIDIA12
Tencent795
G06VImage and video recognition
China Construction Bank24
NVIDIA403
Tencent742
G10LSpeech processing
China Construction Bank4
NVIDIA87
Tencent248
H04WWireless networks
China Construction Bank5
NVIDIA42
Tencent236
G05BControl systems
China Construction Bank1
NVIDIA28
Tencent17

03Where each one leans

Observed emphasis within each company’s collected top-60 IPC subclasses. A dash for another company means outside its top-60 list, not zero applications or a market gap. Incomplete coverage can also change the ordering.

China Construction Bank

  • G06QBusiness data processing
    China Construction Bank
    450
    NVIDIA
    12
    Tencent
    795
  • G06FData processing
    China Construction Bank
    764
    NVIDIA
    881
    Tencent
    3,074
  • H04LDigital transmission
    China Construction Bank
    191
    NVIDIA
    155
    Tencent
    1,218
  • H04MTelephonic communication
    China Construction Bank
    5
    NVIDIA
    5
    Tencent
    25
  • G06K
    China Construction Bank
    2
    NVIDIA
    —
    Tencent
    5
  • G07G
    China Construction Bank
    1
    NVIDIA
    —
    Tencent
    —

NVIDIA

  • G06TImage processing
    China Construction Bank
    13
    NVIDIA
    719
    Tencent
    1,220
  • G06NComputing models, AI
    China Construction Bank
    118
    NVIDIA
    497
    Tencent
    1,015
  • G06VImage and video recognition
    China Construction Bank
    24
    NVIDIA
    403
    Tencent
    742
  • B60WVehicle sub-unit control
    China Construction Bank
    —
    NVIDIA
    138
    Tencent
    25
  • H05KPrinted circuits, assemblies
    China Construction Bank
    —
    NVIDIA
    75
    Tencent
    14
  • G01SRadar, positioning
    China Construction Bank
    —
    NVIDIA
    69
    Tencent
    30

Tencent

  • H04NPictorial communication, video
    China Construction Bank
    8
    NVIDIA
    127
    Tencent
    2,479
  • A63F
    China Construction Bank
    —
    NVIDIA
    43
    Tencent
    1,123
  • H04WWireless networks
    China Construction Bank
    5
    NVIDIA
    42
    Tencent
    236
  • B62DBodies, chassis
    China Construction Bank
    —
    NVIDIA
    4
    Tencent
    45
  • H10N
    China Construction Bank
    —
    NVIDIA
    —
    Tencent
    19
  • G16B
    China Construction Bank
    —
    NVIDIA
    4
    Tencent
    31

04Publication rhythm

China Construction BankNVIDIATencentPublications per period
Publications per period
PeriodChina Construction BankNVIDIATencent
2025-01≥199 (partial coverage)≥182 (partial coverage)≥697 (partial coverage)
2025-02≥228 (partial coverage)≥166 (partial coverage)≥725 (partial coverage)
2025-03≥163 (partial coverage)≥170 (partial coverage)≥558 (partial coverage)
2025-04≥52 (partial coverage)≥158 (partial coverage)≥573 (partial coverage)
2025-05≥15 (partial coverage)≥193 (partial coverage)≥924 (partial coverage)
2025-06≥16 (partial coverage)≥183 (partial coverage)≥601 (partial coverage)
2025-07≥22 (partial coverage)≥243 (partial coverage)≥1,207 (partial coverage)
2025-08≥16 (partial coverage)≥182 (partial coverage)≥809 (partial coverage)
2025-09≥10 (partial coverage)≥265 (partial coverage)≥875 (partial coverage)
2025-10≥11 (partial coverage)≥234 (partial coverage)≥937 (partial coverage)
2025-11≥67 (partial coverage)≥199 (partial coverage)≥761 (partial coverage)
2025-12≥307 (partial coverage)≥212 (partial coverage)≥809 (partial coverage)

Empty dashed outlines mark uncollected periods. Hatched bars and ≥ counts mark partial coverage.

Publication timing follows examination and publication cycles, not R&D intensity.

What makes it comparableThe same publication window and counting units. Companies with different windows are not put in one comparison.

What is not comparableGroup totals. Business and entity scopes differ; compare scale within a field or subclass.

Not a rankingSimilarity and shares describe structure, not patent value, quality or technical leadership.