CNIPA.AI

Company patentsCompare

HEAD TO HEAD

China Construction BankChina Mobile

Technology portfolios compared in the same window and counting units. Scale is compared only within the same field or subclass.

Same window · published 2025-01-01 — 2025-12-31Some name or date coverage is incomplete; affected counts are lower bounds

This is a structural comparison of collected portfolios. The same requested window does not establish equal entity scope, covered months or industry; no competitive ranking is inferred.

Applicant-name coverage differs. The counts below cover only the listed names and do not represent complete company portfolios.

China Construction Bank: Applicant names included in these statistics — CHINA CONSTRUCTION BANK CORPReviewed names not covered — CHINA CONSTRUCTION BANK CORPORATION · 中国建设银行股份有限公司

China Mobile: Applicant names included in these statistics — CHINA MOBILE COMM CO LTD RES INST · CHINA MOBILE COMMUNICATION CO LTD RESEARCH INST · CHINA MOBILE COMMUNICATION CO LTD RESEARCH INSTITUTE · CHINA MOBILE COMMUNICATION COMPANY LTD · CHINA MOBILE GROUP DESIGN INST · CHINA MOBILE HANGZHOU INF TECH CO LTD · CHINA MOBILE INF TECH CO LTD · CHINA MOBILE INFORMATION SYSTEM INTEGRATION CO LTD · CHINA MOBILE INTERNET CO LTD · CHINA MOBILE IOT CO LTD · CHINA MOBILE SUZHOU SOFTWARE TECH CO LTD · CHINA MOBILE SYSTEM INTEGRATION CO LTDReviewed names not covered — CHINA MOBILE (HANGZHOU) INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY COMPANY LIMITED · CHINA MOBILE (SUZHOU) SOFTWARE TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD. · CHINA MOBILE COMMUNICATION CO., LTD. · CHINA MOBILE GROUP DESIGN INSTITUTE CO., LTD. · CHINA MOBILE INFORMATION SYSTEM INTEGRATION CO., LTD. · CHINA MOBILE INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD. · CHINA MOBILE INTERNET COMPANY LIMITED · CHINA MOBILE IOT COMPANY LIMITED · CHINA MOBILE SYSTEM INTEGRATION CO., LTD. · 中国移动通信有限公司 · 中国移动通信集团设计院有限公司 · 中移(苏州)软件技术有限公司 · 中移互联网有限公司 · 中移信息系统集成有限公司 · 中移动信息技术有限公司 · 中移物联网有限公司 · 中移系统集成有限公司 · 中移(杭州)信息技术有限公司

Publications
1,106
Invention share
100%
Concentration
0.72
Green technology
—
Publications
2,808
Invention share
95%
Concentration
0.49
Green technology
—
0.76Field similarity
Cosine similarity of application counts across 35 fields. 1 is identical, 0 is no overlap.

01Technology field mirror

The 12 fields with the largest combined share. Share shows structure; count shows scale.

Technology field mirror
China Construction BankTechnology fieldChina Mobile
72.3%
Computer technology
47.1%
17.9%
Digital communication
51.5%
40.7%
IT methods for management
5.1%
0.5%
Telecommunications
5.4%
0.2%
Audio-visual technology
2.8%
0.5%
Control
1.7%
0%
Measurement
1.4%
0%
Electrical machinery, apparatus, energy
0.9%
0.4%
Medical technology
0.4%
0%
Optics
0.5%
0%
Thermal processes and apparatus
0.4%
0%
Mechanical elements
0.4%

Inspect one technology field

Inspect collected applications, portfolio share and supporting publications within one field. A technology overlap does not establish that companies in different industries are direct competitors.

One application may belong to multiple fields, so shares can sum to more than 100%. Drill-down lists publications; an application publication and its grant may appear separately.

02Same problem: shared IPC subclasses

The 10 subclasses in every company's top 60 with the most combined applications. Scale is compared within a subclass, never across different business scopes.

G06FData processing
China Construction Bank764
China Mobile1,025
H04LDigital transmission
China Construction Bank191
China Mobile839
H04WWireless networks
China Construction Bank5
China Mobile700
G06NComputing models, AI
China Construction Bank118
China Mobile540
G06QBusiness data processing
China Construction Bank450
China Mobile142
G06VImage and video recognition
China Construction Bank24
China Mobile163
G06TImage processing
China Construction Bank13
China Mobile104
H04NPictorial communication, video
China Construction Bank8
China Mobile99
G10LSpeech processing
China Construction Bank4
China Mobile33
H04MTelephonic communication
China Construction Bank5
China Mobile30

03Where each one leans

Observed emphasis within each company’s collected top-60 IPC subclasses. A dash for another company means outside its top-60 list, not zero applications or a market gap. Incomplete coverage can also change the ordering.

China Construction Bank

  • G06QBusiness data processing
    China Construction Bank
    450
    China Mobile
    142
  • G06FData processing
    China Construction Bank
    764
    China Mobile
    1,025
  • G16H
    China Construction Bank
    4
    China Mobile
    7
  • G07F
    China Construction Bank
    1
    China Mobile
    —
  • G07G
    China Construction Bank
    1
    China Mobile
    —

China Mobile

  • H04WWireless networks
    China Construction Bank
    5
    China Mobile
    700
  • H04LDigital transmission
    China Construction Bank
    191
    China Mobile
    839
  • G06NComputing models, AI
    China Construction Bank
    118
    China Mobile
    540
  • G06VImage and video recognition
    China Construction Bank
    24
    China Mobile
    163
  • H04BTransmission
    China Construction Bank
    —
    China Mobile
    83
  • H04NPictorial communication, video
    China Construction Bank
    8
    China Mobile
    99

04Publication rhythm

China Construction BankChina MobilePublications per period
Publications per period
PeriodChina Construction BankChina Mobile
2025-01≥199 (partial coverage)≥257 (partial coverage)
2025-02≥228 (partial coverage)≥275 (partial coverage)
2025-03≥163 (partial coverage)≥212 (partial coverage)
2025-04≥52 (partial coverage)≥209 (partial coverage)
2025-05≥15 (partial coverage)≥268 (partial coverage)
2025-06≥16 (partial coverage)≥128 (partial coverage)
2025-07≥22 (partial coverage)≥160 (partial coverage)
2025-08≥16 (partial coverage)≥203 (partial coverage)
2025-09≥10 (partial coverage)≥168 (partial coverage)
2025-10≥11 (partial coverage)≥323 (partial coverage)
2025-11≥67 (partial coverage)≥159 (partial coverage)
2025-12≥307 (partial coverage)≥446 (partial coverage)

Empty dashed outlines mark uncollected periods. Hatched bars and ≥ counts mark partial coverage.

Publication timing follows examination and publication cycles, not R&D intensity.

What makes it comparableThe same publication window and counting units. Companies with different windows are not put in one comparison.

What is not comparableGroup totals. Business and entity scopes differ; compare scale within a field or subclass.

Not a rankingSimilarity and shares describe structure, not patent value, quality or technical leadership.