CNIPA.AI

Company patentsCompare

HEAD TO HEAD

CXMTEli Lilly

Technology portfolios compared in the same window and counting units. Scale is compared only within the same field or subclass.

Same window · published 2025-01-01 — 2025-12-31Some name or date coverage is incomplete; affected counts are lower bounds

This is a structural comparison of collected portfolios. The same requested window does not establish equal entity scope, covered months or industry; no competitive ranking is inferred.

Applicant-name coverage differs. The counts below cover only the listed names and do not represent complete company portfolios.

CXMT: Applicant names included in these statistics — CHANGXIN MEMORY TECH INC · CHANGXIN MEMORY TECHNOLOGIES INC · CHANGXIN TECH GROUP CO LTD · CXMT CORPReviewed names not covered — CHANGXIN MEMORY TECHNOLOGIES, INC. · CXMT CORPORATION · 睿力集成电路有限公司 · 长鑫存储技术有限公司 · 长鑫科技集团股份有限公司

Eli Lilly: Applicant names included in these statistics — ELI LILLY AND CO · ELI LILLY AND COMPANY USA · LILLY CO ELIReviewed names not covered — ELI LILLY AND COMPANY

Publications
1,570
Invention share
98%
Concentration
0.58
Green technology
—
Publications
1,602
Invention share
45%
Concentration
0.73
Green technology
—
0.00Field similarity
Cosine similarity of application counts across 35 fields. 1 is identical, 0 is no overlap.

01Technology field mirror

The 12 fields with the largest combined share. Share shows structure; count shows scale.

Technology field mirror
CXMTTechnology fieldEli Lilly
0%
Pharmaceuticals
68.5%
67.9%
Semiconductors
0%
0%
Biotechnology
39.9%
33.6%
Computer technology
0.6%
0%
Organic fine chemistry
25.8%
0%
Medical technology
17.6%
5.3%
Basic communication processes
0%
2.3%
Measurement
1%
2.2%
Optics
0%
1.4%
Control
0.6%
0%
Analysis of biological materials
1.7%
0.3%
Chemical engineering
1.4%

Inspect one technology field

Inspect collected applications, portfolio share and supporting publications within one field. A technology overlap does not establish that companies in different industries are direct competitors.

CXMT

Collected applications
7
Share of collected applications with IPC
0.5%

Coverage is incomplete; counts and shares describe only the collected subset.

View CXMT publications in this field

One application may belong to multiple fields, so shares can sum to more than 100%. Drill-down lists publications; an application publication and its grant may appear separately.

02Same problem: shared IPC subclasses

The 10 subclasses in every company's top 60 with the most combined applications. Scale is compared within a subclass, never across different business scopes.

G06FData processing
CXMT60
Eli Lilly2
G01NAnalysing materials
CXMT3
Eli Lilly32
G01RMeasuring electric variables
CXMT25
Eli Lilly3
B01DSeparation, filtering
CXMT1
Eli Lilly17
G05BControl systems
CXMT8
Eli Lilly4
G06TImage processing
CXMT4
Eli Lilly5
B01J
CXMT1
Eli Lilly7
G08B
CXMT2
Eli Lilly5
B08BCleaning
CXMT2
Eli Lilly3
G06NComputing models, AI
CXMT2
Eli Lilly3

03Where each one leans

Observed emphasis within each company’s collected top-60 IPC subclasses. A dash for another company means outside its top-60 list, not zero applications or a market gap. Incomplete coverage can also change the ordering.

CXMT

  • H10BMemory devices
    CXMT
    689
    Eli Lilly
    —
  • G11CStatic stores
    CXMT
    480
    Eli Lilly
    —
  • H01LSemiconductor devices
    CXMT
    378
    Eli Lilly
    —
  • H10D
    CXMT
    220
    Eli Lilly
    —
  • H10W
    CXMT
    161
    Eli Lilly
    —
  • H10P
    CXMT
    68
    Eli Lilly
    —

Eli Lilly

  • A61K
    CXMT
    —
    Eli Lilly
    926
  • A61P
    CXMT
    —
    Eli Lilly
    766
  • C07K
    CXMT
    —
    Eli Lilly
    454
  • C07DHeterocyclic compounds
    CXMT
    —
    Eli Lilly
    300
  • A61M
    CXMT
    —
    Eli Lilly
    196
  • C12NMicroorganisms, enzymes
    CXMT
    —
    Eli Lilly
    153

04Publication rhythm

CXMTEli LillyPublications per period
Publications per period
PeriodCXMTEli Lilly
2025-01≥233 (partial coverage)≥118 (partial coverage)
2025-02≥180 (partial coverage)≥121 (partial coverage)
2025-03≥99 (partial coverage)≥158 (partial coverage)
2025-04≥79 (partial coverage)≥110 (partial coverage)
2025-05≥108 (partial coverage)≥134 (partial coverage)
2025-06≥177 (partial coverage)≥140 (partial coverage)
2025-07≥156 (partial coverage)≥138 (partial coverage)
2025-08≥112 (partial coverage)≥134 (partial coverage)
2025-09≥148 (partial coverage)≥132 (partial coverage)
2025-10≥89 (partial coverage)≥155 (partial coverage)
2025-11≥64 (partial coverage)≥140 (partial coverage)
2025-12≥125 (partial coverage)≥122 (partial coverage)

Empty dashed outlines mark uncollected periods. Hatched bars and ≥ counts mark partial coverage.

Publication timing follows examination and publication cycles, not R&D intensity.

What makes it comparableThe same publication window and counting units. Companies with different windows are not put in one comparison.

What is not comparableGroup totals. Business and entity scopes differ; compare scale within a field or subclass.

Not a rankingSimilarity and shares describe structure, not patent value, quality or technical leadership.