CNIPA.AI

Company patentsCompare

HEAD TO HEAD

CXMTMicrosoftKweichow Moutai

Technology portfolios compared in the same window and counting units. Scale is compared only within the same field or subclass.

Same window · published 2025-01-01 — 2025-12-31Some name or date coverage is incomplete; affected counts are lower bounds

This is a structural comparison of collected portfolios. The same requested window does not establish equal entity scope, covered months or industry; no competitive ranking is inferred.

Applicant-name coverage differs. The counts below cover only the listed names and do not represent complete company portfolios.

CXMT: Applicant names included in these statistics — CHANGXIN MEMORY TECH INC · CHANGXIN MEMORY TECHNOLOGIES INC · CHANGXIN TECH GROUP CO LTD · CXMT CORPReviewed names not covered — CHANGXIN MEMORY TECHNOLOGIES, INC. · CXMT CORPORATION · 睿力集成电路有限公司 · 长鑫存储技术有限公司 · 长鑫科技集团股份有限公司

Microsoft: Applicant names included in these statistics — MICROSOFT TECHNOLOGY LICENSING LLCReviewed names not covered — MICROSOFT TECHNOLOGY LICENSING, LLC · MICROSOFT TECHNOLOGY LICENSING, LLC.

Kweichow Moutai: Applicant names included in these statistics — KWEICHOW MOUTAI CO LTDReviewed names not covered — KWEICHOW MOUTAI CO., LTD. · 贵州茅台酒股份有限公司

CXMT

Publications
1,570
Invention share
98%
Concentration
0.58
Green technology
—

Microsoft

Publications
7,140
Invention share
97%
Concentration
0.59
Green technology
—

Kweichow Moutai

Publications
83
Invention share
71%
Concentration
0.28
Green technology
—
0.45

CXMT × Microsoft

0.24

CXMT × Kweichow Moutai

0.45

Microsoft × Kweichow Moutai

Cosine similarity of application counts across 35 fields. 1 is identical, 0 is no overlap.

01Technology field mirror

The 12 fields with the largest combined share. Share shows structure; count shows scale.

Technology field mirror
Technology fieldCXMT / Microsoft / Kweichow Moutai
Computer technology
33.6%
72.5%
24.1%
Semiconductors
67.9%
2.1%
1.2%
Measurement
2.3%
2.1%
30.1%
Biotechnology
0%
0.4%
24.1%
Digital communication
0.5%
22.4%
0%
Food chemistry
0%
0%
18.1%
Analysis of biological materials
0%
0%
13.3%
Audio-visual technology
0.5%
10.5%
0%
Handling
0.4%
0.1%
9.6%
Environmental technology
0.2%
0.1%
7.2%
Basic communication processes
5.3%
1.3%
0%
IT methods for management
0%
4.2%
2.4%

Inspect one technology field

Inspect collected applications, portfolio share and supporting publications within one field. A technology overlap does not establish that companies in different industries are direct competitors.

CXMT

Collected applications
512
Share of collected applications with IPC
33.6%

Coverage is incomplete; counts and shares describe only the collected subset.

View CXMT publications in this field

One application may belong to multiple fields, so shares can sum to more than 100%. Drill-down lists publications; an application publication and its grant may appear separately.

02Same problem: shared IPC subclasses

The 10 subclasses in every company's top 60 with the most combined applications. Scale is compared within a subclass, never across different business scopes.

G06FData processing
CXMT60
Microsoft3,890
Kweichow Moutai15
G06NComputing models, AI
CXMT2
Microsoft1,064
Kweichow Moutai5
G06VImage and video recognition
CXMT2
Microsoft295
Kweichow Moutai4
H10N
CXMT29
Microsoft45
Kweichow Moutai1
G01NAnalysing materials
CXMT3
Microsoft12
Kweichow Moutai25
G01BMeasuring length, shape
CXMT1
Microsoft11
Kweichow Moutai1
B01J
CXMT1
Microsoft10
Kweichow Moutai1

03Where each one leans

Observed emphasis within each company’s collected top-60 IPC subclasses. A dash for another company means outside its top-60 list, not zero applications or a market gap. Incomplete coverage can also change the ordering.

CXMT

  • H10BMemory devices
    CXMT
    689
    Microsoft
    —
    Kweichow Moutai
    —
  • G11CStatic stores
    CXMT
    480
    Microsoft
    46
    Kweichow Moutai
    —
  • H01LSemiconductor devices
    CXMT
    378
    Microsoft
    51
    Kweichow Moutai
    —
  • H10D
    CXMT
    220
    Microsoft
    13
    Kweichow Moutai
    —
  • H10W
    CXMT
    161
    Microsoft
    49
    Kweichow Moutai
    —
  • H10P
    CXMT
    68
    Microsoft
    —
    Kweichow Moutai
    —

Microsoft

  • G06FData processing
    CXMT
    60
    Microsoft
    3,890
    Kweichow Moutai
    15
  • H04LDigital transmission
    CXMT
    7
    Microsoft
    1,379
    Kweichow Moutai
    —
  • G06NComputing models, AI
    CXMT
    2
    Microsoft
    1,064
    Kweichow Moutai
    5
  • H04NPictorial communication, video
    CXMT
    —
    Microsoft
    482
    Kweichow Moutai
    —
  • G06TImage processing
    CXMT
    4
    Microsoft
    479
    Kweichow Moutai
    —
  • G10LSpeech processing
    CXMT
    —
    Microsoft
    250
    Kweichow Moutai
    —

Kweichow Moutai

  • G01NAnalysing materials
    CXMT
    3
    Microsoft
    12
    Kweichow Moutai
    25
  • C12NMicroorganisms, enzymes
    CXMT
    —
    Microsoft
    11
    Kweichow Moutai
    16
  • C12G
    CXMT
    —
    Microsoft
    —
    Kweichow Moutai
    10
  • C12R
    CXMT
    —
    Microsoft
    —
    Kweichow Moutai
    10
  • C12QBiochemical testing
    CXMT
    —
    Microsoft
    24
    Kweichow Moutai
    9
  • G16B
    CXMT
    —
    Microsoft
    26
    Kweichow Moutai
    6

04Publication rhythm

CXMTMicrosoftKweichow MoutaiPublications per period
Publications per period
PeriodCXMTMicrosoftKweichow Moutai
2025-01≥233 (partial coverage)≥539 (partial coverage)≥6 (partial coverage)
2025-02≥180 (partial coverage)≥503 (partial coverage)≥6 (partial coverage)
2025-03≥99 (partial coverage)≥603 (partial coverage)≥7 (partial coverage)
2025-04≥79 (partial coverage)≥647 (partial coverage)≥2 (partial coverage)
2025-05≥108 (partial coverage)≥566 (partial coverage)≥7 (partial coverage)
2025-06≥177 (partial coverage)≥487 (partial coverage)≥5 (partial coverage)
2025-07≥156 (partial coverage)≥686 (partial coverage)≥5 (partial coverage)
2025-08≥112 (partial coverage)≥563 (partial coverage)≥4 (partial coverage)
2025-09≥148 (partial coverage)≥587 (partial coverage)≥11 (partial coverage)
2025-10≥89 (partial coverage)≥689 (partial coverage)≥10 (partial coverage)
2025-11≥64 (partial coverage)≥582 (partial coverage)≥10 (partial coverage)
2025-12≥125 (partial coverage)≥688 (partial coverage)≥10 (partial coverage)

Empty dashed outlines mark uncollected periods. Hatched bars and ≥ counts mark partial coverage.

Publication timing follows examination and publication cycles, not R&D intensity.

What makes it comparableThe same publication window and counting units. Companies with different windows are not put in one comparison.

What is not comparableGroup totals. Business and entity scopes differ; compare scale within a field or subclass.

Not a rankingSimilarity and shares describe structure, not patent value, quality or technical leadership.