CNIPA.AI

Company patentsCompare

HEAD TO HEAD

BroadcomEli Lilly

Technology portfolios compared in the same window and counting units. Scale is compared only within the same field or subclass.

Same window · published 2025-01-01 — 2025-12-31Some name or date coverage is incomplete; affected counts are lower bounds

This is a structural comparison of collected portfolios. The same requested window does not establish equal entity scope, covered months or industry; no competitive ranking is inferred.

Applicant-name coverage differs. The counts below cover only the listed names and do not represent complete company portfolios.

Broadcom: Applicant names included in these statistics — AVAGO TECH INT SALES PTE LID · AVAGO TECH INTERNATIONAL SALES PTE LTD · VMWARE INC · VMWARE LLCReviewed names not covered — AVAGO TECHNOLOGIES INTERNATIONAL SALES PTE. LIMITED · VMWARE INC.

Eli Lilly: Applicant names included in these statistics — ELI LILLY AND CO · ELI LILLY AND COMPANY USA · LILLY CO ELIReviewed names not covered — ELI LILLY AND COMPANY

Publications
1,230
Invention share
98%
Concentration
0.41
Green technology
—
Publications
1,602
Invention share
45%
Concentration
0.73
Green technology
—
0.01Field similarity
Cosine similarity of application counts across 35 fields. 1 is identical, 0 is no overlap.

01Technology field mirror

The 12 fields with the largest combined share. Share shows structure; count shows scale.

Technology field mirror
BroadcomTechnology fieldEli Lilly
0%
Pharmaceuticals
68.5%
45.2%
Digital communication
0.1%
42.4%
Computer technology
0.6%
0%
Biotechnology
39.9%
0%
Organic fine chemistry
25.8%
0.2%
Medical technology
17.6%
10.9%
Basic communication processes
0%
7.4%
Semiconductors
0%
5.8%
Telecommunications
0%
2.5%
Measurement
1%
3.1%
Audio-visual technology
0.1%
1.8%
Electrical machinery, apparatus, energy
0%

Inspect one technology field

Inspect collected applications, portfolio share and supporting publications within one field. A technology overlap does not establish that companies in different industries are direct competitors.

One application may belong to multiple fields, so shares can sum to more than 100%. Drill-down lists publications; an application publication and its grant may appear separately.

02Same problem: shared IPC subclasses

The 10 subclasses in every company's top 60 with the most combined applications. Scale is compared within a subclass, never across different business scopes.

G06FData processing
Broadcom456
Eli Lilly2
H04WWireless networks
Broadcom126
Eli Lilly2
A61BMedical diagnosis
Broadcom2
Eli Lilly36
G06NComputing models, AI
Broadcom28
Eli Lilly3
G06TImage processing
Broadcom7
Eli Lilly5
G01RMeasuring electric variables
Broadcom7
Eli Lilly3
G01DGeneral measuring
Broadcom6
Eli Lilly2
G06QBusiness data processing
Broadcom5
Eli Lilly3
G06VImage and video recognition
Broadcom4
Eli Lilly2
G01P
Broadcom1
Eli Lilly1

03Where each one leans

Observed emphasis within each company’s collected top-60 IPC subclasses. A dash for another company means outside its top-60 list, not zero applications or a market gap. Incomplete coverage can also change the ordering.

Broadcom

  • G06FData processing
    Broadcom
    456
    Eli Lilly
    2
  • H04LDigital transmission
    Broadcom
    439
    Eli Lilly
    —
  • H04WWireless networks
    Broadcom
    126
    Eli Lilly
    2
  • H03MCoding, decoding
    Broadcom
    62
    Eli Lilly
    —
  • H01LSemiconductor devices
    Broadcom
    60
    Eli Lilly
    —
  • H04BTransmission
    Broadcom
    58
    Eli Lilly
    —

Eli Lilly

  • A61K
    Broadcom
    —
    Eli Lilly
    926
  • A61P
    Broadcom
    —
    Eli Lilly
    766
  • C07K
    Broadcom
    —
    Eli Lilly
    454
  • C07DHeterocyclic compounds
    Broadcom
    —
    Eli Lilly
    300
  • A61M
    Broadcom
    —
    Eli Lilly
    196
  • C12NMicroorganisms, enzymes
    Broadcom
    —
    Eli Lilly
    153

04Publication rhythm

BroadcomEli LillyPublications per period
Publications per period
PeriodBroadcomEli Lilly
2025-01≥207 (partial coverage)≥118 (partial coverage)
2025-02≥92 (partial coverage)≥121 (partial coverage)
2025-03≥141 (partial coverage)≥158 (partial coverage)
2025-04≥163 (partial coverage)≥110 (partial coverage)
2025-05≥101 (partial coverage)≥134 (partial coverage)
2025-06≥79 (partial coverage)≥140 (partial coverage)
2025-07≥77 (partial coverage)≥138 (partial coverage)
2025-08≥56 (partial coverage)≥134 (partial coverage)
2025-09≥69 (partial coverage)≥132 (partial coverage)
2025-10≥86 (partial coverage)≥155 (partial coverage)
2025-11≥94 (partial coverage)≥140 (partial coverage)
2025-12≥65 (partial coverage)≥122 (partial coverage)

Empty dashed outlines mark uncollected periods. Hatched bars and ≥ counts mark partial coverage.

Publication timing follows examination and publication cycles, not R&D intensity.

What makes it comparableThe same publication window and counting units. Companies with different windows are not put in one comparison.

What is not comparableGroup totals. Business and entity scopes differ; compare scale within a field or subclass.

Not a rankingSimilarity and shares describe structure, not patent value, quality or technical leadership.