CNIPA.AI

Company patentsCompare

HEAD TO HEAD

ICBCMetaMicrosoft

Technology portfolios compared in the same window and counting units. Scale is compared only within the same field or subclass.

Same window · published 2025-01-01 — 2025-12-31Some name or date coverage is incomplete; affected counts are lower bounds

This is a structural comparison of collected portfolios. The same requested window does not establish equal entity scope, covered months or industry; no competitive ranking is inferred.

Applicant-name coverage differs. The counts below cover only the listed names and do not represent complete company portfolios.

ICBC: Applicant names included in these statistics — INDUSTRIAL & COMMERCIAL BANK OF CHINA CO LTDReviewed names not covered — INDUSTRIAL AND COMMERCIAL BANK OF CHINA LIMITED · 中国工商银行股份有限公司

Meta: Applicant names included in these statistics — FACEBOOK INC · META PLATFORMS INC · META PLATFORMS TECH LLCReviewed names not covered — FACEBOOK TECHNOLOGIES LLC · FACEBOOK, INC. · META PLATFORMS TECHNOLOGIES , LLC · META PLATFORMS TECHNOLOGIES LLC · META PLATFORMS TECHNOLOGIES, LLC · META PLATFORMS TECHNOLOGIES, LLC. · META PLATFORMS, INC. · OCULUS VR LLC

Microsoft: Applicant names included in these statistics — MICROSOFT TECHNOLOGY LICENSING LLCReviewed names not covered — MICROSOFT TECHNOLOGY LICENSING, LLC · MICROSOFT TECHNOLOGY LICENSING, LLC.

ICBC

Publications
3,242
Invention share
100%
Concentration
0.81
Green technology
—

Meta

Publications
1,545
Invention share
97%
Concentration
0.43
Green technology
—

Microsoft

Publications
7,140
Invention share
97%
Concentration
0.59
Green technology
—
0.70

ICBC × Meta

0.90

ICBC × Microsoft

0.83

Meta × Microsoft

Cosine similarity of application counts across 35 fields. 1 is identical, 0 is no overlap.

01Technology field mirror

The 12 fields with the largest combined share. Share shows structure; count shows scale.

Technology field mirror
Technology fieldICBC / Meta / Microsoft
Computer technology
78.6%
49.3%
72.5%
Digital communication
15.6%
12.4%
22.4%
IT methods for management
41.3%
2.1%
4.2%
Optics
0%
36.7%
3.8%
Audio-visual technology
1%
17%
10.5%
Telecommunications
0.8%
5.5%
3.3%
Electrical machinery, apparatus, energy
0.2%
5.4%
2.1%
Measurement
0.3%
4.1%
2.1%
Semiconductors
0%
3.9%
2.1%
Control
1.8%
0.7%
1%
Medical technology
0.1%
2.5%
0.7%
Furniture, games
0.2%
1.6%
1%

Inspect one technology field

Inspect collected applications, portfolio share and supporting publications within one field. A technology overlap does not establish that companies in different industries are direct competitors.

ICBC

Collected applications
5
Share of collected applications with IPC
0.2%

Coverage is incomplete; counts and shares describe only the collected subset.

View ICBC publications in this field

Meta

Collected applications
79
Share of collected applications with IPC
5.4%

Coverage is incomplete; counts and shares describe only the collected subset.

View Meta publications in this field

One application may belong to multiple fields, so shares can sum to more than 100%. Drill-down lists publications; an application publication and its grant may appear separately.

02Same problem: shared IPC subclasses

The 10 subclasses in every company's top 60 with the most combined applications. Scale is compared within a subclass, never across different business scopes.

G06FData processing
ICBC2,203
Meta541
Microsoft3,890
H04LDigital transmission
ICBC468
Meta112
Microsoft1,379
G06NComputing models, AI
ICBC829
Meta41
Microsoft1,064
G06QBusiness data processing
ICBC1,339
Meta31
Microsoft290
G06TImage processing
ICBC74
Meta307
Microsoft479
G06VImage and video recognition
ICBC259
Meta122
Microsoft295
H04NPictorial communication, video
ICBC26
Meta135
Microsoft482
G10LSpeech processing
ICBC52
Meta60
Microsoft250
H04WWireless networks
ICBC42
Meta101
Microsoft196
H05KPrinted circuits, assemblies
ICBC17
Meta30
Microsoft164

03Where each one leans

Observed emphasis within each company’s collected top-60 IPC subclasses. A dash for another company means outside its top-60 list, not zero applications or a market gap. Incomplete coverage can also change the ordering.

ICBC

  • G06QBusiness data processing
    ICBC
    1,339
    Meta
    31
    Microsoft
    290
  • G06FData processing
    ICBC
    2,203
    Meta
    541
    Microsoft
    3,890
  • G06NComputing models, AI
    ICBC
    829
    Meta
    41
    Microsoft
    1,064
  • G07F
    ICBC
    17
    Meta
    —
    Microsoft
    —
  • G07C
    ICBC
    14
    Meta
    —
    Microsoft
    —
  • G05D
    ICBC
    6
    Meta
    —
    Microsoft
    —

Meta

  • G02BOptical elements
    ICBC
    —
    Meta
    483
    Microsoft
    236
  • G06TImage processing
    ICBC
    74
    Meta
    307
    Microsoft
    479
  • G02FOptical control devices
    ICBC
    —
    Meta
    69
    Microsoft
    19
  • H04WWireless networks
    ICBC
    42
    Meta
    101
    Microsoft
    196
  • H01QAntennas
    ICBC
    —
    Meta
    49
    Microsoft
    16
  • H04RLoudspeakers, microphones
    ICBC
    —
    Meta
    52
    Microsoft
    35

Microsoft

  • H04LDigital transmission
    ICBC
    468
    Meta
    112
    Microsoft
    1,379
  • G11CStatic stores
    ICBC
    —
    Meta
    —
    Microsoft
    46
  • H10N
    ICBC
    —
    Meta
    —
    Microsoft
    45
  • H04MTelephonic communication
    ICBC
    18
    Meta
    8
    Microsoft
    83
  • H03K
    ICBC
    —
    Meta
    —
    Microsoft
    31
  • H10W
    ICBC
    —
    Meta
    4
    Microsoft
    49

04Publication rhythm

ICBCMetaMicrosoftPublications per period
Publications per period
PeriodICBCMetaMicrosoft
2025-01≥136 (partial coverage)≥116 (partial coverage)≥539 (partial coverage)
2025-02≥70 (partial coverage)≥146 (partial coverage)≥503 (partial coverage)
2025-03≥497 (partial coverage)≥163 (partial coverage)≥603 (partial coverage)
2025-04≥497 (partial coverage)≥153 (partial coverage)≥647 (partial coverage)
2025-05≥231 (partial coverage)≥142 (partial coverage)≥566 (partial coverage)
2025-06≥75 (partial coverage)≥124 (partial coverage)≥487 (partial coverage)
2025-07≥85 (partial coverage)≥123 (partial coverage)≥686 (partial coverage)
2025-08≥127 (partial coverage)≥130 (partial coverage)≥563 (partial coverage)
2025-09≥385 (partial coverage)≥94 (partial coverage)≥587 (partial coverage)
2025-10≥284 (partial coverage)≥153 (partial coverage)≥689 (partial coverage)
2025-11≥427 (partial coverage)≥102 (partial coverage)≥582 (partial coverage)
2025-12≥428 (partial coverage)≥99 (partial coverage)≥688 (partial coverage)

Empty dashed outlines mark uncollected periods. Hatched bars and ≥ counts mark partial coverage.

Publication timing follows examination and publication cycles, not R&D intensity.

What makes it comparableThe same publication window and counting units. Companies with different windows are not put in one comparison.

What is not comparableGroup totals. Business and entity scopes differ; compare scale within a field or subclass.

Not a rankingSimilarity and shares describe structure, not patent value, quality or technical leadership.