ICBC
- Collected applications
- 5
- Share of collected applications with IPC
- 0.2%
Coverage is incomplete; counts and shares describe only the collected subset.
View ICBC publications in this fieldCompany patentsCompare
HEAD TO HEAD
ICBCNVIDIATencent
Technology portfolios compared in the same window and counting units. Scale is compared only within the same field or subclass.
+ Agricultural Bank of China2025-01 — 2025-12+ Alibaba2025-01 — 2025-12+ Alphabet (Google)2025-01 — 2025-12+ Amazon2025-01 — 2025-12+ Apple2025-01 — 2025-12+ Bank of China2025-01 — 2025-12+ BOE2024-01 — 2024-12+ Broadcom2025-01 — 2025-12+ BYD2024-01 — 2024-12+ CATL2024-01 — 2024-12+ China Construction Bank2025-01 — 2025-12+ China Mobile2025-01 — 2025-12+ CXMT2025-01 — 2025-12+ Eli Lilly2025-01 — 2025-12+ Huawei2024-01 — 2024-12✓ ICBC2025-01 — 2025-12+ Meta2025-01 — 2025-12+ Microsoft2025-01 — 2025-12+ Midea2024-01 — 2024-12+ Kweichow Moutai2025-01 — 2025-12✓ NVIDIA2025-01 — 2025-12+ PetroChina2025-01 — 2025-12+ SpaceX2025-01 — 2025-12✓ Tencent2025-01 — 2025-12+ Tesla2025-01 — 2025-12
Same window · published 2025-01-01 — 2025-12-31Some name or date coverage is incomplete; affected counts are lower bounds
This is a structural comparison of collected portfolios. The same requested window does not establish equal entity scope, covered months or industry; no competitive ranking is inferred.
Applicant-name coverage differs. The counts below cover only the listed names and do not represent complete company portfolios.
ICBC: Applicant names included in these statistics — INDUSTRIAL & COMMERCIAL BANK OF CHINA CO LTDReviewed names not covered — INDUSTRIAL AND COMMERCIAL BANK OF CHINA LIMITED · 中国工商银行股份有限公司
NVIDIA: Applicant names included in these statistics — NVIDIA CORPReviewed names not covered — NVIDIA CORP. · NVIDIA CORPORATION
Tencent: Applicant names included in these statistics — TENCENT AMERICA LLC · TENCENT TECH SHENZHEN CO LTDReviewed names not covered — TENCENT TECHNOLOGY (SHENZHEN) CO., LTD. · TENCENT TECHNOLOGY (SHENZHEN) COMPANY LIMITED · 腾讯科技（深圳）有限公司 · 腾讯美国有限责任公司
ICBC
- Publications
- 3,242
- Invention share
- 100%
- Concentration
- 0.81
- Green technology
- —
NVIDIA
- Publications
- 2,387
- Invention share
- 81%
- Concentration
- 0.66
- Green technology
- —
Tencent
- Publications
- 9,476
- Invention share
- 99%
- Concentration
- 0.40
- Green technology
- —
0.88
ICBC × NVIDIA
0.86
ICBC × Tencent
0.91
NVIDIA × Tencent
01Technology field mirror
The 12 fields with the largest combined share. Share shows structure; count shows scale.
| Technology field | ICBC / NVIDIA / Tencent |
|---|---|
| Computer technology | 78.6% 79.3% 53.4% |
| IT methods for management | 41.3% 0.5% 8.7% |
| Digital communication | 15.6% 9.1% 19.4% |
| Audio-visual technology | 1% 8.8% 23.4% |
| Furniture, games | 0.2% 1.8% 12.3% |
| Measurement | 0.3% 7% 1.3% |
| Control | 1.8% 5% 1.3% |
| Transport | 0.1% 6.9% 0.8% |
| Telecommunications | 0.8% 2.4% 1% |
| Handling | 0.2% 2.6% 0.9% |
| Basic communication processes | 0.1% 1.8% 0.3% |
| Electrical machinery, apparatus, energy | 0.2% 1.1% 0.1% |
Inspect one technology field
Inspect collected applications, portfolio share and supporting publications within one field. A technology overlap does not establish that companies in different industries are direct competitors.
NVIDIA
- Collected applications
- 25
- Share of collected applications with IPC
- 1.1%
Coverage is incomplete; counts and shares describe only the collected subset.
View NVIDIA publications in this fieldTencent
- Collected applications
- 13
- Share of collected applications with IPC
- 0.1%
Coverage is incomplete; counts and shares describe only the collected subset.
View Tencent publications in this fieldOne application may belong to multiple fields, so shares can sum to more than 100%. Drill-down lists publications; an application publication and its grant may appear separately.
02Same problem: shared IPC subclasses
The 10 subclasses in every company's top 60 with the most combined applications. Scale is compared within a subclass, never across different business scopes.
G06FData processing
ICBC2,203
NVIDIA881
Tencent3,074
H04NPictorial communication, video
ICBC26
NVIDIA127
Tencent2,479
G06NComputing models, AI
ICBC829
NVIDIA497
Tencent1,015
G06QBusiness data processing
ICBC1,339
NVIDIA12
Tencent795
G06TImage processing
ICBC74
NVIDIA719
Tencent1,220
H04LDigital transmission
ICBC468
NVIDIA155
Tencent1,218
G06VImage and video recognition
ICBC259
NVIDIA403
Tencent742
A63F
ICBC5
NVIDIA43
Tencent1,123
G10LSpeech processing
ICBC52
NVIDIA87
Tencent248
H04WWireless networks
ICBC42
NVIDIA42
Tencent236
03Where each one leans
Observed emphasis within each company’s collected top-60 IPC subclasses. A dash for another company means outside its top-60 list, not zero applications or a market gap. Incomplete coverage can also change the ordering.
ICBC
- G06QBusiness data processing
- ICBC
- 1,339
- NVIDIA
- 12
- Tencent
- 795
- G06FData processing
- ICBC
- 2,203
- NVIDIA
- 881
- Tencent
- 3,074
- G06NComputing models, AI
- ICBC
- 829
- NVIDIA
- 497
- Tencent
- 1,015
- H04LDigital transmission
- ICBC
- 468
- NVIDIA
- 155
- Tencent
- 1,218
- G07F
- ICBC
- 17
- NVIDIA
- —
- Tencent
- 9
- G06K
- ICBC
- 12
- NVIDIA
- —
- Tencent
- 5
NVIDIA
- G06TImage processing
- ICBC
- 74
- NVIDIA
- 719
- Tencent
- 1,220
- G06VImage and video recognition
- ICBC
- 259
- NVIDIA
- 403
- Tencent
- 742
- B60WVehicle sub-unit control
- ICBC
- —
- NVIDIA
- 138
- Tencent
- 25
- H05KPrinted circuits, assemblies
- ICBC
- 17
- NVIDIA
- 75
- Tencent
- 14
- G01SRadar, positioning
- ICBC
- —
- NVIDIA
- 69
- Tencent
- 30
- G05D
- ICBC
- 6
- NVIDIA
- 64
- Tencent
- 38
Tencent
- H04NPictorial communication, video
- ICBC
- 26
- NVIDIA
- 127
- Tencent
- 2,479
- A63F
- ICBC
- 5
- NVIDIA
- 43
- Tencent
- 1,123
- H04WWireless networks
- ICBC
- 42
- NVIDIA
- 42
- Tencent
- 236
- B62DBodies, chassis
- ICBC
- —
- NVIDIA
- 4
- Tencent
- 45
- H10N
- ICBC
- —
- NVIDIA
- —
- Tencent
- 19
- G16B
- ICBC
- —
- NVIDIA
- 4
- Tencent
- 31
04Publication rhythm
| Period | ICBC | NVIDIA | Tencent |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-01 | ≥136 (partial coverage) | ≥182 (partial coverage) | ≥697 (partial coverage) |
| 2025-02 | ≥70 (partial coverage) | ≥166 (partial coverage) | ≥725 (partial coverage) |
| 2025-03 | ≥497 (partial coverage) | ≥170 (partial coverage) | ≥558 (partial coverage) |
| 2025-04 | ≥497 (partial coverage) | ≥158 (partial coverage) | ≥573 (partial coverage) |
| 2025-05 | ≥231 (partial coverage) | ≥193 (partial coverage) | ≥924 (partial coverage) |
| 2025-06 | ≥75 (partial coverage) | ≥183 (partial coverage) | ≥601 (partial coverage) |
| 2025-07 | ≥85 (partial coverage) | ≥243 (partial coverage) | ≥1,207 (partial coverage) |
| 2025-08 | ≥127 (partial coverage) | ≥182 (partial coverage) | ≥809 (partial coverage) |
| 2025-09 | ≥385 (partial coverage) | ≥265 (partial coverage) | ≥875 (partial coverage) |
| 2025-10 | ≥284 (partial coverage) | ≥234 (partial coverage) | ≥937 (partial coverage) |
| 2025-11 | ≥427 (partial coverage) | ≥199 (partial coverage) | ≥761 (partial coverage) |
| 2025-12 | ≥428 (partial coverage) | ≥212 (partial coverage) | ≥809 (partial coverage) |
Empty dashed outlines mark uncollected periods. Hatched bars and ≥ counts mark partial coverage.
Publication timing follows examination and publication cycles, not R&D intensity.
What makes it comparableThe same publication window and counting units. Companies with different windows are not put in one comparison.
What is not comparableGroup totals. Business and entity scopes differ; compare scale within a field or subclass.
Not a rankingSimilarity and shares describe structure, not patent value, quality or technical leadership.