CNIPA.AI

Company patentsCompare

HEAD TO HEAD

CXMTMetaMicrosoft

Technology portfolios compared in the same window and counting units. Scale is compared only within the same field or subclass.

Same window · published 2025-01-01 — 2025-12-31Some name or date coverage is incomplete; affected counts are lower bounds

This is a structural comparison of collected portfolios. The same requested window does not establish equal entity scope, covered months or industry; no competitive ranking is inferred.

Applicant-name coverage differs. The counts below cover only the listed names and do not represent complete company portfolios.

CXMT: Applicant names included in these statistics — CHANGXIN MEMORY TECH INC · CHANGXIN MEMORY TECHNOLOGIES INC · CHANGXIN TECH GROUP CO LTD · CXMT CORPReviewed names not covered — CHANGXIN MEMORY TECHNOLOGIES, INC. · CXMT CORPORATION · 睿力集成电路有限公司 · 长鑫存储技术有限公司 · 长鑫科技集团股份有限公司

Meta: Applicant names included in these statistics — FACEBOOK INC · META PLATFORMS INC · META PLATFORMS TECH LLCReviewed names not covered — FACEBOOK TECHNOLOGIES LLC · FACEBOOK, INC. · META PLATFORMS TECHNOLOGIES , LLC · META PLATFORMS TECHNOLOGIES LLC · META PLATFORMS TECHNOLOGIES, LLC · META PLATFORMS TECHNOLOGIES, LLC. · META PLATFORMS, INC. · OCULUS VR LLC

Microsoft: Applicant names included in these statistics — MICROSOFT TECHNOLOGY LICENSING LLCReviewed names not covered — MICROSOFT TECHNOLOGY LICENSING, LLC · MICROSOFT TECHNOLOGY LICENSING, LLC.

CXMT

Publications
1,570
Invention share
98%
Concentration
0.58
Green technology
—

Meta

Publications
1,545
Invention share
97%
Concentration
0.43
Green technology
—

Microsoft

Publications
7,140
Invention share
97%
Concentration
0.59
Green technology
—
0.41

CXMT × Meta

0.45

CXMT × Microsoft

0.83

Meta × Microsoft

Cosine similarity of application counts across 35 fields. 1 is identical, 0 is no overlap.

01Technology field mirror

The 12 fields with the largest combined share. Share shows structure; count shows scale.

Technology field mirror
Technology fieldCXMT / Meta / Microsoft
Computer technology
33.6%
49.3%
72.5%
Semiconductors
67.9%
3.9%
2.1%
Optics
2.2%
36.7%
3.8%
Digital communication
0.5%
12.4%
22.4%
Audio-visual technology
0.5%
17%
10.5%
Telecommunications
0.1%
5.5%
3.3%
Electrical machinery, apparatus, energy
1.2%
5.4%
2.1%
Measurement
2.3%
4.1%
2.1%
Basic communication processes
5.3%
0.6%
1.3%
IT methods for management
0%
2.1%
4.2%
Medical technology
0%
2.5%
0.7%
Control
1.4%
0.7%
1%

Inspect one technology field

Inspect collected applications, portfolio share and supporting publications within one field. A technology overlap does not establish that companies in different industries are direct competitors.

CXMT

Collected applications
18
Share of collected applications with IPC
1.2%

Coverage is incomplete; counts and shares describe only the collected subset.

View CXMT publications in this field

Meta

Collected applications
79
Share of collected applications with IPC
5.4%

Coverage is incomplete; counts and shares describe only the collected subset.

View Meta publications in this field

One application may belong to multiple fields, so shares can sum to more than 100%. Drill-down lists publications; an application publication and its grant may appear separately.

02Same problem: shared IPC subclasses

The 10 subclasses in every company's top 60 with the most combined applications. Scale is compared within a subclass, never across different business scopes.

G06FData processing
CXMT60
Meta541
Microsoft3,890
H04LDigital transmission
CXMT7
Meta112
Microsoft1,379
G06NComputing models, AI
CXMT2
Meta41
Microsoft1,064
G06TImage processing
CXMT4
Meta307
Microsoft479
H01LSemiconductor devices
CXMT378
Meta37
Microsoft51
G06VImage and video recognition
CXMT2
Meta122
Microsoft295
H10W
CXMT161
Meta4
Microsoft49
H05KPrinted circuits, assemblies
CXMT7
Meta30
Microsoft164
H04BTransmission
CXMT2
Meta23
Microsoft108
H02JPower supply, energy storage
CXMT1
Meta15
Microsoft54

03Where each one leans

Observed emphasis within each company’s collected top-60 IPC subclasses. A dash for another company means outside its top-60 list, not zero applications or a market gap. Incomplete coverage can also change the ordering.

CXMT

  • H10BMemory devices
    CXMT
    689
    Meta
    7
    Microsoft
    —
  • G11CStatic stores
    CXMT
    480
    Meta
    —
    Microsoft
    46
  • H01LSemiconductor devices
    CXMT
    378
    Meta
    37
    Microsoft
    51
  • H10D
    CXMT
    220
    Meta
    —
    Microsoft
    13
  • H10W
    CXMT
    161
    Meta
    4
    Microsoft
    49
  • H10P
    CXMT
    68
    Meta
    —
    Microsoft
    —

Meta

  • G02BOptical elements
    CXMT
    —
    Meta
    483
    Microsoft
    236
  • G06TImage processing
    CXMT
    4
    Meta
    307
    Microsoft
    479
  • G02FOptical control devices
    CXMT
    —
    Meta
    69
    Microsoft
    19
  • H04WWireless networks
    CXMT
    —
    Meta
    101
    Microsoft
    196
  • G06VImage and video recognition
    CXMT
    2
    Meta
    122
    Microsoft
    295
  • H01QAntennas
    CXMT
    —
    Meta
    49
    Microsoft
    16

Microsoft

  • G06FData processing
    CXMT
    60
    Meta
    541
    Microsoft
    3,890
  • G06NComputing models, AI
    CXMT
    2
    Meta
    41
    Microsoft
    1,064
  • H04LDigital transmission
    CXMT
    7
    Meta
    112
    Microsoft
    1,379
  • G06QBusiness data processing
    CXMT
    —
    Meta
    31
    Microsoft
    290
  • H04MTelephonic communication
    CXMT
    —
    Meta
    8
    Microsoft
    83
  • G16C
    CXMT
    —
    Meta
    —
    Microsoft
    30

04Publication rhythm

CXMTMetaMicrosoftPublications per period
Publications per period
PeriodCXMTMetaMicrosoft
2025-01≥233 (partial coverage)≥116 (partial coverage)≥539 (partial coverage)
2025-02≥180 (partial coverage)≥146 (partial coverage)≥503 (partial coverage)
2025-03≥99 (partial coverage)≥163 (partial coverage)≥603 (partial coverage)
2025-04≥79 (partial coverage)≥153 (partial coverage)≥647 (partial coverage)
2025-05≥108 (partial coverage)≥142 (partial coverage)≥566 (partial coverage)
2025-06≥177 (partial coverage)≥124 (partial coverage)≥487 (partial coverage)
2025-07≥156 (partial coverage)≥123 (partial coverage)≥686 (partial coverage)
2025-08≥112 (partial coverage)≥130 (partial coverage)≥563 (partial coverage)
2025-09≥148 (partial coverage)≥94 (partial coverage)≥587 (partial coverage)
2025-10≥89 (partial coverage)≥153 (partial coverage)≥689 (partial coverage)
2025-11≥64 (partial coverage)≥102 (partial coverage)≥582 (partial coverage)
2025-12≥125 (partial coverage)≥99 (partial coverage)≥688 (partial coverage)

Empty dashed outlines mark uncollected periods. Hatched bars and ≥ counts mark partial coverage.

Publication timing follows examination and publication cycles, not R&D intensity.

What makes it comparableThe same publication window and counting units. Companies with different windows are not put in one comparison.

What is not comparableGroup totals. Business and entity scopes differ; compare scale within a field or subclass.

Not a rankingSimilarity and shares describe structure, not patent value, quality or technical leadership.