Alibaba
- Collected applications
- 3
- Share of collected applications with IPC
- 0.3%
Coverage is incomplete; counts and shares describe only the collected subset.
View Alibaba publications in this fieldCompany patentsCompare
HEAD TO HEAD
AlibabaMicrosoft
Technology portfolios compared in the same window and counting units. Scale is compared only within the same field or subclass.
+ Agricultural Bank of China2025-01 — 2025-12✓ Alibaba2025-01 — 2025-12+ Alphabet (Google)2025-01 — 2025-12+ Amazon2025-01 — 2025-12+ Apple2025-01 — 2025-12+ Bank of China2025-01 — 2025-12+ BOE2024-01 — 2024-12+ Broadcom2025-01 — 2025-12+ BYD2024-01 — 2024-12+ CATL2024-01 — 2024-12+ China Construction Bank2025-01 — 2025-12+ China Mobile2025-01 — 2025-12+ CXMT2025-01 — 2025-12+ Eli Lilly2025-01 — 2025-12+ Huawei2024-01 — 2024-12+ ICBC2025-01 — 2025-12+ Meta2025-01 — 2025-12✓ Microsoft2025-01 — 2025-12+ Midea2024-01 — 2024-12+ Kweichow Moutai2025-01 — 2025-12+ NVIDIA2025-01 — 2025-12+ PetroChina2025-01 — 2025-12+ SpaceX2025-01 — 2025-12+ Tencent2025-01 — 2025-12+ Tesla2025-01 — 2025-12
Same window · published 2025-01-01 — 2025-12-31Some name or date coverage is incomplete; affected counts are lower bounds
This is a structural comparison of collected portfolios. The same requested window does not establish equal entity scope, covered months or industry; no competitive ranking is inferred.
Applicant-name coverage differs. The counts below cover only the listed names and do not represent complete company portfolios.
Alibaba: Applicant names included in these statistics — ALIBABA CHINA CO LTD · ALIBABA CLOUD COMPUTING CO LTD · ALIBABA CLOUD COMPUTING LTD · ALIBABA GROUP HOLDING LTDReviewed names not covered — ALIBABA (CHINA) CO., LTD. · ALIBABA CLOUD COMPUTING CO., LTD. · ALIBABA CLOUD COMPUTING LTD. · ALIBABA GROUP HOLDING LIMITED · 阿里云计算有限公司 · 阿里巴巴集团控股有限公司 · 阿里巴巴（中国）有限公司
Microsoft: Applicant names included in these statistics — MICROSOFT TECHNOLOGY LICENSING LLCReviewed names not covered — MICROSOFT TECHNOLOGY LICENSING, LLC · MICROSOFT TECHNOLOGY LICENSING, LLC.
- Publications
- 1,101
- Invention share
- 96%
- Concentration
- 0.51
- Green technology
- —
- Publications
- 7,140
- Invention share
- 97%
- Concentration
- 0.59
- Green technology
- —
0.95Field similarity
01Technology field mirror
The 12 fields with the largest combined share. Share shows structure; count shows scale.
| Alibaba | Technology field | Microsoft |
|---|---|---|
63.5% | Computer technology | 72.5% |
29.8% | Audio-visual technology | 10.5% |
12.5% | Digital communication | 22.4% |
3.7% | IT methods for management | 4.2% |
0% | Optics | 3.8% |
0% | Telecommunications | 3.3% |
0.8% | Measurement | 2.1% |
0.6% | Semiconductors | 2.1% |
0.3% | Electrical machinery, apparatus, energy | 2.1% |
0.6% | Basic communication processes | 1.3% |
0.2% | Control | 1% |
0.4% | Medical technology | 0.7% |
Inspect one technology field
Inspect collected applications, portfolio share and supporting publications within one field. A technology overlap does not establish that companies in different industries are direct competitors.
Microsoft
- Collected applications
- 147
- Share of collected applications with IPC
- 2.1%
Coverage is incomplete; counts and shares describe only the collected subset.
View Microsoft publications in this fieldOne application may belong to multiple fields, so shares can sum to more than 100%. Drill-down lists publications; an application publication and its grant may appear separately.
02Same problem: shared IPC subclasses
The 10 subclasses in every company's top 60 with the most combined applications. Scale is compared within a subclass, never across different business scopes.
G06FData processing
Alibaba547
Microsoft3,890
H04LDigital transmission
Alibaba113
Microsoft1,379
G06NComputing models, AI
Alibaba173
Microsoft1,064
H04NPictorial communication, video
Alibaba331
Microsoft482
G06TImage processing
Alibaba67
Microsoft479
G06VImage and video recognition
Alibaba70
Microsoft295
G06QBusiness data processing
Alibaba40
Microsoft290
G10LSpeech processing
Alibaba25
Microsoft250
H04WWireless networks
Alibaba9
Microsoft196
H05KPrinted circuits, assemblies
Alibaba3
Microsoft164
03Where each one leans
Observed emphasis within each company’s collected top-60 IPC subclasses. A dash for another company means outside its top-60 list, not zero applications or a market gap. Incomplete coverage can also change the ordering.
Alibaba
- H04NPictorial communication, video
- Alibaba
- 331
- Microsoft
- 482
- G06VImage and video recognition
- Alibaba
- 70
- Microsoft
- 295
- G06NComputing models, AI
- Alibaba
- 173
- Microsoft
- 1,064
- G08G
- Alibaba
- 2
- Microsoft
- —
- H10BMemory devices
- Alibaba
- 2
- Microsoft
- —
- B25JManipulators, robots
- Alibaba
- 1
- Microsoft
- —
Microsoft
- H04LDigital transmission
- Alibaba
- 113
- Microsoft
- 1,379
- G06FData processing
- Alibaba
- 547
- Microsoft
- 3,890
- G02BOptical elements
- Alibaba
- —
- Microsoft
- 236
- H05KPrinted circuits, assemblies
- Alibaba
- 3
- Microsoft
- 164
- H04WWireless networks
- Alibaba
- 9
- Microsoft
- 196
- H04BTransmission
- Alibaba
- —
- Microsoft
- 108
04Publication rhythm
| Period | Alibaba | Microsoft |
|---|---|---|
| 2025-01 | ≥78 (partial coverage) | ≥539 (partial coverage) |
| 2025-02 | ≥71 (partial coverage) | ≥503 (partial coverage) |
| 2025-03 | ≥72 (partial coverage) | ≥603 (partial coverage) |
| 2025-04 | ≥65 (partial coverage) | ≥647 (partial coverage) |
| 2025-05 | ≥71 (partial coverage) | ≥566 (partial coverage) |
| 2025-06 | ≥83 (partial coverage) | ≥487 (partial coverage) |
| 2025-07 | ≥82 (partial coverage) | ≥686 (partial coverage) |
| 2025-08 | ≥104 (partial coverage) | ≥563 (partial coverage) |
| 2025-09 | ≥119 (partial coverage) | ≥587 (partial coverage) |
| 2025-10 | ≥94 (partial coverage) | ≥689 (partial coverage) |
| 2025-11 | ≥115 (partial coverage) | ≥582 (partial coverage) |
| 2025-12 | ≥147 (partial coverage) | ≥688 (partial coverage) |
Empty dashed outlines mark uncollected periods. Hatched bars and ≥ counts mark partial coverage.
Publication timing follows examination and publication cycles, not R&D intensity.
What makes it comparableThe same publication window and counting units. Companies with different windows are not put in one comparison.
What is not comparableGroup totals. Business and entity scopes differ; compare scale within a field or subclass.
Not a rankingSimilarity and shares describe structure, not patent value, quality or technical leadership.