CNIPA.AI

Company patentsCompare

HEAD TO HEAD

AmazonNVIDIASpaceX

Technology portfolios compared in the same window and counting units. Scale is compared only within the same field or subclass.

Same window · published 2025-01-01 — 2025-12-31Some name or date coverage is incomplete; affected counts are lower bounds

This is a structural comparison of collected portfolios. The same requested window does not establish equal entity scope, covered months or industry; no competitive ranking is inferred.

Applicant-name coverage differs. The counts below cover only the listed names and do not represent complete company portfolios.

Amazon: Applicant names included in these statistics — AMAZON TECH INCReviewed names not covered — AMAZON TECHNOLOGIES INC · AMAZON TECHNOLOGIES INC. · AMAZON TECHNOLOGIES, INC · AMAZON TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

NVIDIA: Applicant names included in these statistics — NVIDIA CORPReviewed names not covered — NVIDIA CORP. · NVIDIA CORPORATION

SpaceX: Applicant names included in these statistics — SPACE EXPLORATION TECH CORPReviewed names not covered — SPACE EXPLORATION TECHNOLOGIES CORP. · SPACE EXPLORATION TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION

Amazon

Publications
2,095
Invention share
93%
Concentration
0.54
Green technology
—

NVIDIA

Publications
2,387
Invention share
81%
Concentration
0.66
Green technology
—

SpaceX

Publications
71
Invention share
80%
Concentration
0.71
Green technology
—
0.95

Amazon × NVIDIA

0.20

Amazon × SpaceX

0.08

NVIDIA × SpaceX

Cosine similarity of application counts across 35 fields. 1 is identical, 0 is no overlap.

01Technology field mirror

The 12 fields with the largest combined share. Share shows structure; count shows scale.

Technology field mirror
Technology fieldAmazon / NVIDIA / SpaceX
Computer technology
65.9%
79.3%
0%
Telecommunications
4%
2.4%
78.1%
Digital communication
29.5%
9.1%
29.7%
Audio-visual technology
7%
8.8%
1.6%
Measurement
3.8%
7%
3.1%
Transport
3.5%
6.9%
1.6%
Basic communication processes
0.8%
1.8%
9.4%
Control
5.2%
5%
0%
IT methods for management
7.9%
0.5%
0%
Electrical machinery, apparatus, energy
2%
1.1%
4.7%
Handling
4.9%
2.6%
0%
Mechanical elements
0.2%
0.3%
4.7%

Inspect one technology field

Inspect collected applications, portfolio share and supporting publications within one field. A technology overlap does not establish that companies in different industries are direct competitors.

One application may belong to multiple fields, so shares can sum to more than 100%. Drill-down lists publications; an application publication and its grant may appear separately.

02Same problem: shared IPC subclasses

The 10 subclasses in every company's top 60 with the most combined applications. Scale is compared within a subclass, never across different business scopes.

H04LDigital transmission
Amazon442
NVIDIA155
SpaceX13
H04WWireless networks
Amazon114
NVIDIA42
SpaceX15
H04BTransmission
Amazon40
NVIDIA43
SpaceX29
H05KPrinted circuits, assemblies
Amazon20
NVIDIA75
SpaceX1
G01SRadar, positioning
Amazon24
NVIDIA69
SpaceX2
H03MCoding, decoding
Amazon7
NVIDIA21
SpaceX1

03Where each one leans

Observed emphasis within each company’s collected top-60 IPC subclasses. A dash for another company means outside its top-60 list, not zero applications or a market gap. Incomplete coverage can also change the ordering.

Amazon

  • G10LSpeech processing
    Amazon
    275
    NVIDIA
    87
    SpaceX
    —
  • G06QBusiness data processing
    Amazon
    154
    NVIDIA
    12
    SpaceX
    —
  • G06FData processing
    Amazon
    912
    NVIDIA
    881
    SpaceX
    —
  • H04LDigital transmission
    Amazon
    442
    NVIDIA
    155
    SpaceX
    13
  • B65GConveying, storage
    Amazon
    48
    NVIDIA
    —
    SpaceX
    —
  • H04RLoudspeakers, microphones
    Amazon
    34
    NVIDIA
    5
    SpaceX
    —

NVIDIA

  • G06TImage processing
    Amazon
    101
    NVIDIA
    719
    SpaceX
    —
  • G06VImage and video recognition
    Amazon
    138
    NVIDIA
    403
    SpaceX
    —
  • G06NComputing models, AI
    Amazon
    257
    NVIDIA
    497
    SpaceX
    —
  • B60WVehicle sub-unit control
    Amazon
    5
    NVIDIA
    138
    SpaceX
    —
  • H05KPrinted circuits, assemblies
    Amazon
    20
    NVIDIA
    75
    SpaceX
    1
  • G01CNavigation, surveying
    Amazon
    22
    NVIDIA
    59
    SpaceX
    —

SpaceX

  • H01QAntennas
    Amazon
    11
    NVIDIA
    —
    SpaceX
    30
  • H04BTransmission
    Amazon
    40
    NVIDIA
    43
    SpaceX
    29
  • H04WWireless networks
    Amazon
    114
    NVIDIA
    42
    SpaceX
    15
  • H03L
    Amazon
    —
    NVIDIA
    5
    SpaceX
    4
  • C08K
    Amazon
    —
    NVIDIA
    —
    SpaceX
    2
  • F16BFasteners
    Amazon
    —
    NVIDIA
    —
    SpaceX
    2

04Publication rhythm

AmazonNVIDIASpaceXPublications per period
Publications per period
PeriodAmazonNVIDIASpaceX
2025-01≥242 (partial coverage)≥182 (partial coverage)≥6 (partial coverage)
2025-02≥149 (partial coverage)≥166 (partial coverage)≥10 (partial coverage)
2025-03≥130 (partial coverage)≥170 (partial coverage)≥6 (partial coverage)
2025-04≥168 (partial coverage)≥158 (partial coverage)≥3 (partial coverage)
2025-05≥186 (partial coverage)≥193 (partial coverage)≥10 (partial coverage)
2025-06≥140 (partial coverage)≥183 (partial coverage)≥7 (partial coverage)
2025-07≥223 (partial coverage)≥243 (partial coverage)≥8 (partial coverage)
2025-08≥161 (partial coverage)≥182 (partial coverage)≥2 (partial coverage)
2025-09≥195 (partial coverage)≥265 (partial coverage)≥7 (partial coverage)
2025-10≥201 (partial coverage)≥234 (partial coverage)≥3 (partial coverage)
2025-11≥141 (partial coverage)≥199 (partial coverage)≥6 (partial coverage)
2025-12≥159 (partial coverage)≥212 (partial coverage)≥3 (partial coverage)

Empty dashed outlines mark uncollected periods. Hatched bars and ≥ counts mark partial coverage.

Publication timing follows examination and publication cycles, not R&D intensity.

What makes it comparableThe same publication window and counting units. Companies with different windows are not put in one comparison.

What is not comparableGroup totals. Business and entity scopes differ; compare scale within a field or subclass.

Not a rankingSimilarity and shares describe structure, not patent value, quality or technical leadership.