HEAD TO HEAD

China Construction BankEli LillyNVIDIA

Technology portfolios compared in the same window and counting units. Scale is compared only within the same field or subclass.

Same window · published 2025-01-01 — 2025-12-31Some name or date coverage is incomplete; affected counts are lower bounds

This is a structural comparison of collected portfolios. The same requested window does not establish equal entity scope, covered months or industry; no competitive ranking is inferred.

Applicant-name coverage differs. The counts below cover only the listed names and do not represent complete company portfolios.

China Construction Bank: Applicant names included in these statistics — CHINA CONSTRUCTION BANK CORPReviewed names not covered — CHINA CONSTRUCTION BANK CORPORATION · 中国建设银行股份有限公司

Eli Lilly: Applicant names included in these statistics — ELI LILLY AND CO · ELI LILLY AND COMPANY USA · LILLY CO ELIReviewed names not covered — ELI LILLY AND COMPANY

NVIDIA: Applicant names included in these statistics — NVIDIA CORPReviewed names not covered — NVIDIA CORP. · NVIDIA CORPORATION

China Construction Bank

Publications: 1,106
Invention share: 100%
Concentration: 0.72
Green technology: —

Eli Lilly

Publications: 1,602
Invention share: 45%
Concentration: 0.73
Green technology: —

NVIDIA

Publications: 2,387
Invention share: 81%
Concentration: 0.66
Green technology: —

0.01

China Construction Bank × Eli Lilly

0.86

China Construction Bank × NVIDIA

0.01

Eli Lilly × NVIDIA

Cosine similarity of application counts across 35 fields. 1 is identical, 0 is no overlap.

01Technology field mirror

The 12 fields with the largest combined share. Share shows structure; count shows scale.

Technology field mirror
Technology field	China Construction Bank / Eli Lilly / NVIDIA
Computer technology	72.3% 0.6% 79.3%
Pharmaceuticals	0% 68.5% 0%
IT methods for management	40.7% 0.2% 0.5%
Biotechnology	0% 39.9% 0%
Digital communication	17.9% 0.1% 9.1%
Organic fine chemistry	0% 25.8% 0%
Medical technology	0.4% 17.6% 0.5%
Audio-visual technology	0.2% 0.1% 8.8%
Measurement	0% 1% 7%
Transport	0% 0% 6.9%
Control	0.5% 0.6% 5%
Telecommunications	0.5% 0% 2.4%

Inspect one technology field

Inspect collected applications, portfolio share and supporting publications within one field. A technology overlap does not establish that companies in different industries are direct competitors.

Technology field to inspect

China Construction Bank

Collected applications: 2
Share of collected applications with IPC: 0.2%

Coverage is incomplete; counts and shares describe only the collected subset.

View China Construction Bank publications in this field

Eli Lilly

Collected applications: 1
Share of collected applications with IPC: 0.1%

Coverage is incomplete; counts and shares describe only the collected subset.

View Eli Lilly publications in this field

NVIDIA

Collected applications: 206
Share of collected applications with IPC: 8.8%

Coverage is incomplete; counts and shares describe only the collected subset.

View NVIDIA publications in this field

One application may belong to multiple fields, so shares can sum to more than 100%. Drill-down lists publications; an application publication and its grant may appear separately.

02Same problem: shared IPC subclasses

The 10 subclasses in every company's top 60 with the most combined applications. Scale is compared within a subclass, never across different business scopes.

G06FData processing

China Construction Bank764

Eli Lilly2

NVIDIA881

G06TImage processing

China Construction Bank13

Eli Lilly5

NVIDIA719

G06NComputing models, AI

China Construction Bank118

Eli Lilly3

NVIDIA497

G06QBusiness data processing

China Construction Bank450

Eli Lilly3

NVIDIA12

G06VImage and video recognition

China Construction Bank24

Eli Lilly2

NVIDIA403

H04WWireless networks

China Construction Bank5

Eli Lilly2

NVIDIA42

G16H

China Construction Bank4

Eli Lilly36

NVIDIA8

G05BControl systems

China Construction Bank1

Eli Lilly4

NVIDIA28

03Where each one leans

Observed emphasis within each company’s collected top-60 IPC subclasses. A dash for another company means outside its top-60 list, not zero applications or a market gap. Incomplete coverage can also change the ordering.