CNIPA.AI

Company patentsCompare

HEAD TO HEAD

ICBCNVIDIA

Technology portfolios compared in the same window and counting units. Scale is compared only within the same field or subclass.

Same window · published 2025-01-01 — 2025-12-31Some name or date coverage is incomplete; affected counts are lower bounds

This is a structural comparison of collected portfolios. The same requested window does not establish equal entity scope, covered months or industry; no competitive ranking is inferred.

Applicant-name coverage differs. The counts below cover only the listed names and do not represent complete company portfolios.

ICBC: Applicant names included in these statistics — INDUSTRIAL & COMMERCIAL BANK OF CHINA CO LTDReviewed names not covered — INDUSTRIAL AND COMMERCIAL BANK OF CHINA LIMITED · 中国工商银行股份有限公司

NVIDIA: Applicant names included in these statistics — NVIDIA CORPReviewed names not covered — NVIDIA CORP. · NVIDIA CORPORATION

Publications
3,242
Invention share
100%
Concentration
0.81
Green technology
—
Publications
2,387
Invention share
81%
Concentration
0.66
Green technology
—
0.88Field similarity
Cosine similarity of application counts across 35 fields. 1 is identical, 0 is no overlap.

01Technology field mirror

The 12 fields with the largest combined share. Share shows structure; count shows scale.

Technology field mirror
ICBCTechnology fieldNVIDIA
78.6%
Computer technology
79.3%
41.3%
IT methods for management
0.5%
15.6%
Digital communication
9.1%
1%
Audio-visual technology
8.8%
0.3%
Measurement
7%
0.1%
Transport
6.9%
1.8%
Control
5%
0.8%
Telecommunications
2.4%
0.2%
Handling
2.6%
0.2%
Furniture, games
1.8%
0.1%
Basic communication processes
1.8%
0.2%
Electrical machinery, apparatus, energy
1.1%

Inspect one technology field

Inspect collected applications, portfolio share and supporting publications within one field. A technology overlap does not establish that companies in different industries are direct competitors.

ICBC

Collected applications
5
Share of collected applications with IPC
0.2%

Coverage is incomplete; counts and shares describe only the collected subset.

View ICBC publications in this field

One application may belong to multiple fields, so shares can sum to more than 100%. Drill-down lists publications; an application publication and its grant may appear separately.

02Same problem: shared IPC subclasses

The 10 subclasses in every company's top 60 with the most combined applications. Scale is compared within a subclass, never across different business scopes.

G06FData processing
ICBC2,203
NVIDIA881
G06QBusiness data processing
ICBC1,339
NVIDIA12
G06NComputing models, AI
ICBC829
NVIDIA497
G06TImage processing
ICBC74
NVIDIA719
G06VImage and video recognition
ICBC259
NVIDIA403
H04LDigital transmission
ICBC468
NVIDIA155
H04NPictorial communication, video
ICBC26
NVIDIA127
G10LSpeech processing
ICBC52
NVIDIA87
H05KPrinted circuits, assemblies
ICBC17
NVIDIA75
H04WWireless networks
ICBC42
NVIDIA42

03Where each one leans

Observed emphasis within each company’s collected top-60 IPC subclasses. A dash for another company means outside its top-60 list, not zero applications or a market gap. Incomplete coverage can also change the ordering.

ICBC

  • G06QBusiness data processing
    ICBC
    1,339
    NVIDIA
    12
  • G06FData processing
    ICBC
    2,203
    NVIDIA
    881
  • H04LDigital transmission
    ICBC
    468
    NVIDIA
    155
  • G06NComputing models, AI
    ICBC
    829
    NVIDIA
    497
  • G07F
    ICBC
    17
    NVIDIA
    —
  • G06K
    ICBC
    12
    NVIDIA
    —

NVIDIA

  • G06TImage processing
    ICBC
    74
    NVIDIA
    719
  • G06VImage and video recognition
    ICBC
    259
    NVIDIA
    403
  • B60WVehicle sub-unit control
    ICBC
    —
    NVIDIA
    138
  • H04NPictorial communication, video
    ICBC
    26
    NVIDIA
    127
  • G01SRadar, positioning
    ICBC
    —
    NVIDIA
    69
  • H05KPrinted circuits, assemblies
    ICBC
    17
    NVIDIA
    75

04Publication rhythm

ICBCNVIDIAPublications per period
Publications per period
PeriodICBCNVIDIA
2025-01≥136 (partial coverage)≥182 (partial coverage)
2025-02≥70 (partial coverage)≥166 (partial coverage)
2025-03≥497 (partial coverage)≥170 (partial coverage)
2025-04≥497 (partial coverage)≥158 (partial coverage)
2025-05≥231 (partial coverage)≥193 (partial coverage)
2025-06≥75 (partial coverage)≥183 (partial coverage)
2025-07≥85 (partial coverage)≥243 (partial coverage)
2025-08≥127 (partial coverage)≥182 (partial coverage)
2025-09≥385 (partial coverage)≥265 (partial coverage)
2025-10≥284 (partial coverage)≥234 (partial coverage)
2025-11≥427 (partial coverage)≥199 (partial coverage)
2025-12≥428 (partial coverage)≥212 (partial coverage)

Empty dashed outlines mark uncollected periods. Hatched bars and ≥ counts mark partial coverage.

Publication timing follows examination and publication cycles, not R&D intensity.

What makes it comparableThe same publication window and counting units. Companies with different windows are not put in one comparison.

What is not comparableGroup totals. Business and entity scopes differ; compare scale within a field or subclass.

Not a rankingSimilarity and shares describe structure, not patent value, quality or technical leadership.