CNIPA.AI

Company patentsCompare

HEAD TO HEAD

AppleMicrosoftPetroChina

Technology portfolios compared in the same window and counting units. Scale is compared only within the same field or subclass.

Same window · published 2025-01-01 — 2025-12-31Some name or date coverage is incomplete; affected counts are lower bounds

This is a structural comparison of collected portfolios. The same requested window does not establish equal entity scope, covered months or industry; no competitive ranking is inferred.

Applicant-name coverage differs. The counts below cover only the listed names and do not represent complete company portfolios.

Apple: Applicant names included in these statistics — APPLE INCReviewed names not covered — APPLE COMPUTER INC · APPLE COMPUTER, INC. · APPLE INC. · APPLE, INC.

Microsoft: Applicant names included in these statistics — MICROSOFT TECHNOLOGY LICENSING LLCReviewed names not covered — MICROSOFT TECHNOLOGY LICENSING, LLC · MICROSOFT TECHNOLOGY LICENSING, LLC.

PetroChina: Applicant names included in these statistics — PETROCHINA CO LTDReviewed names not covered — PETROCHINA COMPANY LIMITED · 中国石油天然气股份有限公司

Apple

Publications
12,360
Invention share
87%
Concentration
0.38
Green technology
—

Microsoft

Publications
7,140
Invention share
97%
Concentration
0.59
Green technology
—

PetroChina

Publications
6,110
Invention share
95%
Concentration
0.25
Green technology
—
0.85

Apple × Microsoft

0.35

Apple × PetroChina

0.46

Microsoft × PetroChina

Cosine similarity of application counts across 35 fields. 1 is identical, 0 is no overlap.

01Technology field mirror

The 12 fields with the largest combined share. Share shows structure; count shows scale.

Technology field mirror
Technology fieldApple / Microsoft / PetroChina
Computer technology
39.1%
72.5%
22.4%
Digital communication
42.1%
22.4%
0.7%
Civil engineering
0.1%
0.3%
31.5%
Measurement
5.7%
2.1%
22.9%
Audio-visual technology
14.2%
10.5%
0.4%
Telecommunications
13.9%
3.3%
0.1%
IT methods for management
2.4%
4.2%
9.5%
Basic materials chemistry
0%
0.1%
11.9%
Optics
7.2%
3.8%
0.1%
Electrical machinery, apparatus, energy
4.8%
2.1%
3.6%
Chemical engineering
0.1%
0.2%
9%
Macromolecular chemistry, polymers
0%
0%
6.9%

Inspect one technology field

Inspect collected applications, portfolio share and supporting publications within one field. A technology overlap does not establish that companies in different industries are direct competitors.

Apple

Collected applications
531
Share of collected applications with IPC
4.8%

Coverage is incomplete; counts and shares describe only the collected subset.

View Apple publications in this field

One application may belong to multiple fields, so shares can sum to more than 100%. Drill-down lists publications; an application publication and its grant may appear separately.

02Same problem: shared IPC subclasses

The 10 subclasses in every company's top 60 with the most combined applications. Scale is compared within a subclass, never across different business scopes.

G06FData processing
Apple3,635
Microsoft3,890
PetroChina1,114
H04LDigital transmission
Apple2,146
Microsoft1,379
PetroChina32
G06TImage processing
Apple986
Microsoft479
PetroChina180
G06NComputing models, AI
Apple200
Microsoft1,064
PetroChina268
G06QBusiness data processing
Apple264
Microsoft290
PetroChina577
G06VImage and video recognition
Apple417
Microsoft295
PetroChina81
G01NAnalysing materials
Apple24
Microsoft12
PetroChina752
H02JPower supply, energy storage
Apple225
Microsoft54
PetroChina69
H01MBatteries, electrochemical cells
Apple91
Microsoft22
PetroChina79
G01RMeasuring electric variables
Apple61
Microsoft28
PetroChina24

03Where each one leans

Observed emphasis within each company’s collected top-60 IPC subclasses. A dash for another company means outside its top-60 list, not zero applications or a market gap. Incomplete coverage can also change the ordering.

Apple

  • H04WWireless networks
    Apple
    3,570
    Microsoft
    196
    PetroChina
    —
  • H04BTransmission
    Apple
    981
    Microsoft
    108
    PetroChina
    —
  • G02BOptical elements
    Apple
    679
    Microsoft
    236
    PetroChina
    —
  • H04MTelephonic communication
    Apple
    405
    Microsoft
    83
    PetroChina
    —
  • H04RLoudspeakers, microphones
    Apple
    318
    Microsoft
    35
    PetroChina
    —
  • G09GDisplay control
    Apple
    300
    Microsoft
    69
    PetroChina
    —

Microsoft

  • G06FData processing
    Apple
    3,635
    Microsoft
    3,890
    PetroChina
    1,114
  • G06NComputing models, AI
    Apple
    200
    Microsoft
    1,064
    PetroChina
    268
  • H04LDigital transmission
    Apple
    2,146
    Microsoft
    1,379
    PetroChina
    32
  • G10LSpeech processing
    Apple
    240
    Microsoft
    250
    PetroChina
    —
  • H05KPrinted circuits, assemblies
    Apple
    155
    Microsoft
    164
    PetroChina
    —
  • G06VImage and video recognition
    Apple
    417
    Microsoft
    295
    PetroChina
    81

PetroChina

  • E21B
    Apple
    —
    Microsoft
    —
    PetroChina
    1,882
  • G01NAnalysing materials
    Apple
    24
    Microsoft
    12
    PetroChina
    752
  • G01V
    Apple
    —
    Microsoft
    —
    PetroChina
    571
  • B01J
    Apple
    —
    Microsoft
    10
    PetroChina
    385
  • C09KMaterials for applications
    Apple
    —
    Microsoft
    —
    PetroChina
    330
  • G06QBusiness data processing
    Apple
    264
    Microsoft
    290
    PetroChina
    577

04Publication rhythm

AppleMicrosoftPetroChinaPublications per period
Publications per period
PeriodAppleMicrosoftPetroChina
2025-01≥1,049 (partial coverage)≥539 (partial coverage)≥410 (partial coverage)
2025-02≥968 (partial coverage)≥503 (partial coverage)≥695 (partial coverage)
2025-03≥1,319 (partial coverage)≥603 (partial coverage)≥574 (partial coverage)
2025-04≥1,232 (partial coverage)≥647 (partial coverage)≥558 (partial coverage)
2025-05≥993 (partial coverage)≥566 (partial coverage)≥1,028 (partial coverage)
2025-06≥846 (partial coverage)≥487 (partial coverage)≥674 (partial coverage)
2025-07≥956 (partial coverage)≥686 (partial coverage)≥299 (partial coverage)
2025-08≥989 (partial coverage)≥563 (partial coverage)≥143 (partial coverage)
2025-09≥906 (partial coverage)≥587 (partial coverage)≥486 (partial coverage)
2025-10≥928 (partial coverage)≥689 (partial coverage)≥403 (partial coverage)
2025-11≥1,005 (partial coverage)≥582 (partial coverage)≥383 (partial coverage)
2025-12≥1,169 (partial coverage)≥688 (partial coverage)≥457 (partial coverage)

Empty dashed outlines mark uncollected periods. Hatched bars and ≥ counts mark partial coverage.

Publication timing follows examination and publication cycles, not R&D intensity.

What makes it comparableThe same publication window and counting units. Companies with different windows are not put in one comparison.

What is not comparableGroup totals. Business and entity scopes differ; compare scale within a field or subclass.

Not a rankingSimilarity and shares describe structure, not patent value, quality or technical leadership.