CNIPA.AI

Company patentsCompare

HEAD TO HEAD

AppleSpaceXTesla

Technology portfolios compared in the same window and counting units. Scale is compared only within the same field or subclass.

Same window · published 2025-01-01 — 2025-12-31Some name or date coverage is incomplete; affected counts are lower bounds

This is a structural comparison of collected portfolios. The same requested window does not establish equal entity scope, covered months or industry; no competitive ranking is inferred.

Applicant-name coverage differs. The counts below cover only the listed names and do not represent complete company portfolios.

Apple: Applicant names included in these statistics — APPLE INCReviewed names not covered — APPLE COMPUTER INC · APPLE COMPUTER, INC. · APPLE INC. · APPLE, INC.

SpaceX: Applicant names included in these statistics — SPACE EXPLORATION TECH CORPReviewed names not covered — SPACE EXPLORATION TECHNOLOGIES CORP. · SPACE EXPLORATION TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION

Tesla: Applicant names included in these statistics — TESLA INC · TESLA MOTORS INCReviewed names not covered — TESLA MOTORS, INC. · TESLA, INC.

Apple

Publications
12,360
Invention share
87%
Concentration
0.38
Green technology
—

SpaceX

Publications
71
Invention share
80%
Concentration
0.71
Green technology
—

Tesla

Publications
609
Invention share
91%
Concentration
0.29
Green technology
—
0.46

Apple × SpaceX

0.42

Apple × Tesla

0.10

SpaceX × Tesla

Cosine similarity of application counts across 35 fields. 1 is identical, 0 is no overlap.

01Technology field mirror

The 12 fields with the largest combined share. Share shows structure; count shows scale.

Technology field mirror
Technology fieldApple / SpaceX / Tesla
Telecommunications
13.9%
78.1%
1.8%
Digital communication
42.1%
29.7%
2.4%
Computer technology
39.1%
0%
24.4%
Electrical machinery, apparatus, energy
4.8%
4.7%
33.6%
Transport
0.6%
1.6%
31.6%
Audio-visual technology
14.2%
1.6%
4.5%
Measurement
5.7%
3.1%
4.2%
Basic communication processes
2%
9.4%
1.2%
Mechanical elements
0.2%
4.7%
5.2%
Semiconductors
3%
0%
6.2%
Optics
7.2%
0%
1.7%
Control
1.9%
0%
5.2%

Inspect one technology field

Inspect collected applications, portfolio share and supporting publications within one field. A technology overlap does not establish that companies in different industries are direct competitors.

Apple

Collected applications
531
Share of collected applications with IPC
4.8%

Coverage is incomplete; counts and shares describe only the collected subset.

View Apple publications in this field

Tesla

Collected applications
200
Share of collected applications with IPC
33.6%

Coverage is incomplete; counts and shares describe only the collected subset.

View Tesla publications in this field

One application may belong to multiple fields, so shares can sum to more than 100%. Drill-down lists publications; an application publication and its grant may appear separately.

02Same problem: shared IPC subclasses

The 10 subclasses in every company's top 60 with the most combined applications. Scale is compared within a subclass, never across different business scopes.

H04LDigital transmission
Apple2,146
SpaceX13
Tesla13
H02JPower supply, energy storage
Apple225
SpaceX2
Tesla23
G01SRadar, positioning
Apple199
SpaceX2
Tesla8
H01QAntennas
Apple150
SpaceX30
Tesla5
H05KPrinted circuits, assemblies
Apple155
SpaceX1
Tesla19

03Where each one leans

Observed emphasis within each company’s collected top-60 IPC subclasses. A dash for another company means outside its top-60 list, not zero applications or a market gap. Incomplete coverage can also change the ordering.

Apple

  • G06FData processing
    Apple
    3,635
    SpaceX
    —
    Tesla
    85
  • H04WWireless networks
    Apple
    3,570
    SpaceX
    15
    Tesla
    —
  • H04NPictorial communication, video
    Apple
    931
    SpaceX
    —
    Tesla
    5
  • G06TImage processing
    Apple
    986
    SpaceX
    —
    Tesla
    21
  • G02BOptical elements
    Apple
    679
    SpaceX
    —
    Tesla
    7
  • H04MTelephonic communication
    Apple
    405
    SpaceX
    —
    Tesla
    —

SpaceX

  • H01QAntennas
    Apple
    150
    SpaceX
    30
    Tesla
    5
  • H04BTransmission
    Apple
    981
    SpaceX
    29
    Tesla
    —
  • H03L
    Apple
    31
    SpaceX
    4
    Tesla
    —
  • C08K
    Apple
    —
    SpaceX
    2
    Tesla
    —
  • F16M
    Apple
    —
    SpaceX
    2
    Tesla
    —
  • H02H
    Apple
    —
    SpaceX
    2
    Tesla
    —

Tesla

  • H01MBatteries, electrochemical cells
    Apple
    91
    SpaceX
    —
    Tesla
    115
  • G06NComputing models, AI
    Apple
    200
    SpaceX
    —
    Tesla
    66
  • B60LElectric vehicle propulsion
    Apple
    —
    SpaceX
    —
    Tesla
    36
  • B62DBodies, chassis
    Apple
    —
    SpaceX
    —
    Tesla
    36
  • B60WVehicle sub-unit control
    Apple
    —
    SpaceX
    —
    Tesla
    35
  • B60RVehicle electrics, fittings
    Apple
    —
    SpaceX
    —
    Tesla
    30

04Publication rhythm

AppleSpaceXTeslaPublications per period
Publications per period
PeriodAppleSpaceXTesla
2025-01≥1,049 (partial coverage)≥6 (partial coverage)≥57 (partial coverage)
2025-02≥968 (partial coverage)≥10 (partial coverage)≥37 (partial coverage)
2025-03≥1,319 (partial coverage)≥6 (partial coverage)≥27 (partial coverage)
2025-04≥1,232 (partial coverage)≥3 (partial coverage)≥43 (partial coverage)
2025-05≥993 (partial coverage)≥10 (partial coverage)≥60 (partial coverage)
2025-06≥846 (partial coverage)≥7 (partial coverage)≥58 (partial coverage)
2025-07≥956 (partial coverage)≥8 (partial coverage)≥52 (partial coverage)
2025-08≥989 (partial coverage)≥2 (partial coverage)≥56 (partial coverage)
2025-09≥906 (partial coverage)≥7 (partial coverage)≥52 (partial coverage)
2025-10≥928 (partial coverage)≥3 (partial coverage)≥56 (partial coverage)
2025-11≥1,005 (partial coverage)≥6 (partial coverage)≥54 (partial coverage)
2025-12≥1,169 (partial coverage)≥3 (partial coverage)≥57 (partial coverage)

Empty dashed outlines mark uncollected periods. Hatched bars and ≥ counts mark partial coverage.

Publication timing follows examination and publication cycles, not R&D intensity.

What makes it comparableThe same publication window and counting units. Companies with different windows are not put in one comparison.

What is not comparableGroup totals. Business and entity scopes differ; compare scale within a field or subclass.

Not a rankingSimilarity and shares describe structure, not patent value, quality or technical leadership.